Skip to content | Change text size
Assets | Includes | header.shtml
 

Academic Board Minutes 6-2008

MINUTES

Meeting No 6/2008 of the Academic Board was held on Wednesday 8 October 2008 from 3:30pm-5:30pm, in the Council Chambers, First floor, Building 3A, Clayton campus.

Rhonda Hinds
Secretary
14 October 2008

There were present:
Professor Jayne Godfrey (Chair), Professors David Abramson, Sam Adeloju, Associate Professors Phil Andrews, Helen Bartlett, Dr Becky Batagol, Professors John Beardall, Andrew Benjamin, Ms Joan Benjamin, Associate Professor Jason Beringer, Drs Mita Bhattacharya, Gideon Boas, Ross Booth, Ben Boyd, Professor Robert Brooks, Dr Sue Burney, Professors Barbara Caine, Ben Canny, Ray Cas, Keryn Chalmers, Associate Professor Janice Chesters, Professors James Chin, Graham Coleman, Ian Copland, Edwina Cornish, Mr Max Coulthard, Professors Rod Devenish, Merran Evans, Stephanie Fahey, Associate Professor Graham Farr, Professors Arie Freiberg, Leah Garrett, Dr Matthew Groves, Ms Cathrine Harboe-Ree, Professors Bernard Hoffert, Owen Hughes, Associate Professor John Hurst, Professor Christian Jakob, Ms Dash Jayasuriya, Dr Colin Jevons, Professors Jenny Keating, Peter Kershaw, Max King, Susan Kneebone, Paul Komesaroff, Kim Langfield-Smith, Steven Langford, Associate Professors Vincent Lee, Margaret Lindorff, Dr Joy Lyneham, Professor Justin Malbon, Dr Susan Mayson, Professors Dennis Moore, Ross Mouer, Mr Fintan Murphy, Mr Alan McMeekin, Associate Professor Sid Nair, Dr Bronwyn Naylor, Professors Debra Nestel, Harmen Oppewal, Alan Petersen, Ms Alexandra Phelan, Ms Phuong Dzung Pho, Professors Leon Piterman, Robin Pollard, Tyrone Pretorius, Terri Seddon, John Sheridan, Adam Shoemaker, Michael Skully, Julian Smith, Leone Spiccia, Tam Sridhar, Phillip Steele, Associate Professor Kay Stewart, Professors On Kit Tam, Julian Teicher, Dr Cristine Varsavsky, Mr David Watson, Professors Geoff Webb, Ron Weber, Steven Wesselingh, Rob Willis, Associate Professor Cherrie Zhu.

Apologies were received from:
Dr Dirk Baltzly, Professor Val Clulow, Dr Sandra Cockfield, Professors Wendy Cross, Helen De Cieri, Ms Nupur Desai, Professor Rae Frances, Associate Professor Sally Joy, Professors Richard Larkins, Arthur Lowery, Tony Luff, Associate Professor Robert Nelson, Professors Robert Norris, Marilyn Pittard, John Redmond, Dr Richard Reina, Associate Professor Jennifer Rolland, Professors Peter Schelluch, Amrik Sohal, Dr Wendy Sutherland-Smith, Professors Nigel Tapper, Bruce Tonge, Dr Sabatino Ventura, Professors James Whisstock, Sue Willis, Dr Rita Wilson.

Special Leave:
Drs Gloria Davies, Chandani Lokuge, MaryLou Rasmussen, Elizabeth Wilson-Evered, Professor William Young.

Observers:
Professor Lynette Russell (for Professor Rae Frances), Ms Moh-Lee Ng (Shadow for Professor Merran Evans), Mr Renn Wortly, Ms Nikki Rickard (Shadow for Professor Max King), Professor Sue Robson, Ms Sally Zanic, Ms Sue Gleeson, Mr Tony Calder.

Overseas Observers:
Professor Walter Wong (Malaysia), Professors Pua, Anuar Zaini, R Edwards, Lee Poh Aun.

In attendance:
Ms R Hinds

AGENDA

A     PRELIMINARY AND FORMAL BUSINESS

1   WELCOME

Professor Jayne Godfrey welcomed members and observers to the meeting, including those attending the meeting by teleconference from the offshore and Gippsland campuses.

2   ARRANGEMENT OF AGENDA

2.1 Alterations to the Agenda and Starring of Items

Professor Godfrey informed members of the following alterations:

  • Order of items – item 8.2 to be taken as the first item of business, accompanied by a tabled paper.

2.2 Approval of Non-Starred Items

No items were starred. Item 5.1 – The Vice-Chancellor’s Report – was unstarred.

The recommendations of the Steering Committee were adopted without discussion for all items other than those starred.

2.3 Confidential Item

There were no confidential items presented to this meeting.

3   MINUTES

3.1 Minutes of Academic Board Meeting 5/2008

The Minutes of Meeting 5/2008, held on Wednesday, 3 September 2008, were confirmed subject to the following amendments:

In item 5.1, last bullet point – delete “including ... CEO” and insert the deleted text immediately after “Academy” in the bullet point above.

Inclusion of members whose attendance was not recorded previously.

3.2 Business arising from the Minutes

3.2.1 Schedule of Action Items

Noting the continuous updating process represented by the Schedule, Academic Board received and noted the updated Schedule of Action Items.

4   PRESIDENT’S BUSINESS

4.1 President’s Report

Professor Godfrey addressed the Board on a range of issues, including:

  • The default method for distribution of Academic Board meeting minutes and extracts would, from now on, be soft copy. The default method for distribution of Academic Board agendas would remain hard copy. Members who wished to receive minutes and extracts in hard copy, and those who wished to receive their agendas and papers electronically, should contact the Secretary.
  • Consultation with HR regarding improved induction for members (an item arising from consultations around the Board’s composition) had been undertaken – as a result, an improved member information booklet would be sent to all members next year, and two induction sessions would also be offered during 2009.
  • Her attendance at very successful graduation ceremonies on the Sunway campus, which were particularly significant as most of the graduands had been educated at the Sunway campus rather than in Australia, as was once the case. The opportunity to meet with Heads of School had also been taken, and progress had subsequently occurred in relation to resolving academic issues discussed at that meeting.
  • Congratulations were extended to Professor Cornish and her team on the success of Research Month. Members were also encouraged to attend Educate 08 activities.
  • The Annual Report of the President, Academic Board had been presented to Council’s last meeting. An updated iteration would be provided to the next meeting of the Board.
  • The last meeting of Council resolved to incorporate forms of recognition of indigenous students at graduation ceremonies.

Academic Board received and noted the report of the President.

For information: Professor J Godfrey

4.2 Review of the Composition of Academic Board

Professor Godfrey reported on the latest developments in the process of reviewing the Board’s composition. The following matters were highlighted:

  • A range of issues was under consideration by the Working party e.g. requirements for statutory change, definitional issues, transitional requirements, and the Working Party was scheduled to meet before the last Academic Board meeting for the year.
  • Consultation with the University Solicitor’s office regarding necessary legislative amendments had commenced.
  • It was expected that final recommendations would be brought to Academic Board for consideration at its last meeting.
  • Work on the review of the principal standing committees was progressing.

Members proceeded to discuss issues surrounding the “Head of Academic Unit”, and were advised that:

  • A definition that functioned across all faculties, centres etc. was being considered, in consultation with faculties.
  • Heads of Academic Units would also be eligible for the “elected members” category.
  • The Head of Academic Unit cohort would be determined by the faculties and could also be determined via a process of election.

Academic Board received and noted the report of progress in the review of the composition of Academic Board.

For information: Professor J Godfrey, Ms R Hinds

5   VICE-CHANCELLOR’S BUSINESS

5.1 Vice-Chancellor’s Report

Academic Board received and noted the Vice-Chancellor’s report.

For information: Professor R Larkins

6   QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

There were no questions on notice.

B     DIRECTION OF ACADEMIC AFFAIRS

7   INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENTS

7.1 IITB - Monash Research Academy

Members had before them a report on progress towards establishment of the IITB - Monash Research Academy, which included details of the joint venture arrangement. Professor Sridhar introduced this item by informing members that:

  • The joint venture agreement had been signed recently. The formal launch was scheduled for 26 November, in Bombay.
  • Under the joint venture PhD program, students would be admitted to both the Australian and Indian institutions.
  • The first tranche of 18 PhD students had been admitted – it was expected that, once the program was underway, there would be 200-300 PhD students enrolled at any one time. The process leading to admission was rigorous.
  • Programs would span a range of disciplines including IT, Medicine, Engineering.
  • $9.7 million funding had been committed to date, with further industry sponsorship anticipated.
  • Further information was accessible via the website - http://www.iitbmonash.org/.

During discussion, members commented that this initiative was critical to the future success of research at Monash, given the strategic importance of the region, access to a large pool of talented students, increasing research and development activities in the region and the potential of eResearch to transform graduate programs.

Members were strongly encouraged to support the joint venture and to explore opportunities for cross-disciplinary supervision.

Academic Board received and noted the update on establishment of the IITB - Monash Research Academy.

For information: Professors T Sridhar, M King, Ms L Miller

7.2 The Bologna Process

Professor Evans presented an overview of the Bologna process and European Higher Education Area (EHEA), indicating that it was important to continue to monitor developments in the European sector.

Referring to the Lisbon Convention, she noted that unlike the Bologna declaration, the Convention was legally binding on signatories, of which Australia was one. The Convention committed signatories to, inter alia, quality and transparency of qualifications and required production of some form of Diploma Supplement. Professor Evans advised members that as a response to this requirement, all Australian universities would move to introduce a Higher Education Graduation Statement.

Responding to a member question regarding application of the European Credit Transfer System (ECTS) to the Monash system of credit allocation, Professor Evans undertook to clarify the manner in which it applied.

Academic Board received and noted the overview of the Bologna Process.

For information: Professor M Evans

8    NATIONAL ISSUES

8.1 AUQA Audit 2008-2012

Professor Evans introduced the report on timelines for the AUQA Audit 2008-2012 and key extracts from the AUQA Audit Manual, emphasising that, although Monash would not be audited until 2012, it was important to commence preparations at an early stage. She outlined the different approach to the second round audits, noting that internationalisation would be a theme for the Monash audit.

Relevant material e.g. briefing papers would be brought to the Board at appropriate stages to inform preparations for the audit.

Academic Board received and noted the report on the AUQA Audit 2008-2012.

For information: Professor M Evans

8.2 Freedom of Information

Mr Renn Wortley, University Special Counsel, briefed members on the recent Supreme Court decision in University of Melbourne v. McKean, commencing his presentation by outlining the requirements of Freedom of Information (FoI) legislation (including an applicant’s rights and agency’s obligations) before explaining the salient features of the McKean case and its implications for Victorian universities.

Mr Wortley noted that the focus of the appeal had been whether the use of certain examination papers and similar documents had not been completed, thus rendering the documents exempt from release under FoI legislation. He explained that the Court had ruled the papers in question, taken as a whole, stood as documents on their own and the particular use for which the documents had been prepared was completed – therefore, the exemption did not apply.

Commenting on the immediate implications for Monash, Mr Wortley suggested that where examination papers and guides were subject to regular and significant change, the decision seemed unlikely to have adverse impact. However, it was also suggested that one of the Board’s principal standing committees could usefully conduct a cross-institutional survey of courses whose examinations and assessments used a question bank or database of a similar type as that applicable in McKean. In the longer term, universities could consider lobbying for introduction of amendments to FoI legislation.

In discussion, members commented that:

  • In a climate of Government commitment to expanding rather than narrowing FoI legislation, lobbying efforts were likely to be in vain.
  • Controlled inspection of an examination script was a form of access to information but may not completely satisfy the McKean criteria.

Academic Board:

  • Received and noted the briefing on the decision in University of Melbourne v. McKean.
  • Referred to Education Committee to Education Committee the role of surveying the use of assessment question banks throughout the University and reporting to a future meeting of the Board regarding the steps that would be appropriate to facilitate University compliance with FoI requirements, but more importantly, to ensure that high educational standards of assessment were being upheld.

For information: Mr R Wortley, Professor A Shoemaker, Ms F Hunt, Mr M Fenaughty

9   REPORTS FROM THE DEPUTY VICE-CHANCELLORS

9.1 Education

Professor Adam Shoemaker reported on the Monash Passport. He reminded members that it directly addressed the University Priorities 2009-2013, no.1 - Develop and badge an innovative approach to learning and teaching at Monash – before moving on to explain the background to the Passport, including the Coursework Review outcomes. Measures of Monash success in Education were also highlighted.

Emphasising that the Passport represented a distinctive, student-centred blueprint for education, Professor Shoemaker outlined the salient features of the program including the global experience, breadth, depth, richness and (where appropriate) acceleration.

Professor Shoemaker explained key aspects of and recent developments in the program components including undergraduate research, Honours and secondary student enhancement, volunteering and internships and international mobility.

During discussion, members considered a range of issues, including:

  • Responding to a member’s concern that the Passport appeared to emphasise the pathway from undergraduate Honours to a PhD, members were advised that Honours could apply at many times during a student’s career including at Master’s level.
  • Many of the Passport’s features already existed, but under the program they were extended, expanded or repackaged. New forms of pedagogy were also likely to emerge.
  • Despite financial constraints, Monash needed to offer a distinctive approach to education, to attract and retain the best students and staff. Development of the program had been undertaken on a cost-efficient basis and following wide consultation at all levels of the Monash community.
  • Completion of Honours was a prerequisite to many professional careers as well as research careers.
  • The Passport represented a very important public statement by Monash and a positive message to potential students, schools etc.

9.2 Research

Professor Edwina Cornish, reported on significant developments in the Research Portfolio. She contextualised her comments within the straitened circumstances that applied across the sector, but posited improvement in the event that the Bradley Review recommendations were implemented.

She advised members that in a recent meeting, Senator Kim Carr’s adviser indicated that the Minister viewed Monash very positively, offering the opportunity to consider how Labor’s hub and spokes model might be implemented. Monash had undertaken to provide practical examples of the model‘s application and to this end, Professor Cornish would be seeking input.

She also noted that whilst Research Month was successful as a public profiling exercise, it had attracted limited internal engagement. Members were therefore urged to support Educate 08.

9.3 International

Professor Stephanie Fahey reported on significant developments in the International Portfolio. Noting that a key priority of the Portfolio was to develop links with international institutions, business and industry, thereby increasing international HDRs and research funding, she reported on recent visits to Vietnam and the United States.

Members were advised that the Vietnamese Government was committing substantial funding to the education sector over the next 12 years, with a range of emerging opportunities for Monash including engagement by MUELC in development of curriculum for bridging programs and provision of input into teaching; promotion of HDR students to Monash Sunway and Australia; opportunities for curriculum licensing and joint research training; great interest being shown in the GCHE. To maximise opportunities, the Office of the DVC (I) was therefore developing an Action Plan for Vietnam.

A number of visits to key figures in the University of California (UC) network, Arizona State University and the California Institute of Regenerative Medicine, had been made during the trip to the U.S. Outcomes from the round of meetings included potential opportunities around UC Berkley, especially in the area of climate change; interest in participation in Prato programs; extension of invitations to significant figures to visit Monash. There was also likely to be opportunity to learn from the huge improvement by Arizona State University in the Shanghai Jiao Tong rankings.

Academic Board received and noted the reports from the Deputy Vice-Chancellors.

For information: Professors A Shoemaker, E Cornish, S Fahey

10   FACULTY PRESENTATION – MEDICINE, NURSING AND HEALTH SCIENCES

Professor Steve Wesselingh presented two of the Faculty’s 10 strategic priorities:

MBio (Bioscience)

The aim was to develop Clayton as the no.1 bioscience campus in Australia – Professor Wesselingh also advised members that by mid-2009, it would be the largest biomedical precinct on one site in Victoria.

Members were advised that the aim was achievable for a range of reasons, including the profile and record of the School of Biomedical Sciences, proximity to CSIRO and the Synchrotron, collaboration with the Faculties of Engineering and Science and location of the Regenerative Medicine Institute.

Professor Wesselingh outlined MBio’s student and staff profile, growth in research income ($62.3 million in 2007), THES ranking (22nd in the world for Life Sciences and Biomedicine) and wide range of core facilities. It was noted that MBio generated research funding and papers comparable to outcomes from the Walter and Eliza Hall Institute. MBio, together with the Monash Health Research Precinct and the Alfred Medical Research and Education Precinct, constituted the Monash Health Sciences Cluster.

Public and Global Health

The third of the strategic priorities was to expand public and global health research within the Faculty, including establishment of a School of Public Health and to create a research network between the domestic and offshore campuses. Members were advised of the establishment of the Finkel Chair of Global Health, pursuant to an endowment from the Chancellor and his wife.

Academic Board received and noted Professor Wesselingh’s presentation.

For information: Professor S Wesselingh

C     SUPERVISION OF ACADEMIC AFFAIRS

11   KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

Members had before them the draft University Key Performance Indicators and Internal Performance Indicators. Discussion on these items was deferred to meeting 7/2008.

(Secretarial note: Council is due to consider the reports at its meetings scheduled for 27 October.)

Professor Evans undertook to provide a summary of the THES rankings for distribution to members.

For information: Professor M Evans

12   MONASH UNIVERSITY GRADUATE ATTRIBUTES

The revised Monash University Graduate Attributes were endorsed by Education Committee Meeting 5-2008 for transmission to Academic Board.

Professor Adam Shoemaker introduced the Graduate Attributes by observing that they had been recast in a simpler and more practical form.

Academic Board approved the revised Monash University Graduate Attributes.

For information: Professor A Shoemaker

13   ACADEMIC PROMOTIONS PROCEDURES 2009

Professor Shoemaker introduced the draft Academic Promotions Procedures by advising members that they had been revised following a range of comments made at the Board’s first meeting of 2008.

Academic Board approved the Academic Promotion Procedures for 2009.

For information: Professor A Shoemaker, Ms K Haywood

D     GOVERNANCE

14   POLICY DEVELOPMENT AND REVIEW

14.1 English Language Requirements Policy

Academic Board approved the English Language Requirements Policy.

For information: Ms N Mitchell, Mr M Fenaughty, Mr K Williamson

14.2 Recognition of Excellence Policy and Procedures

Academic Board approved the Recognition of Excellence Policy and noted the accompanying Procedures.

For information: Ms N Mitchell, Mr M Fenaughty, Mr K Williamson

15   ACADEMIC BOARD MEMBERSHIP

No items were presented to this meeting.

16   FACULTY BOARDS AND STANDING COMMITTEES

16.1 Transnational Quality Assurance and Improvement Committee

Academic Board disestablished the Transnational Quality Assurance and Improvement Committee.

For information: Mr M Fenaughty, Ms K Roth

17   REPORTS FROM STANDING COMMITTEES

17.1 Education Committee Meeting 5/2008

Academic Board received and noted the Report of Meeting 5/2008 of the Education Committee.

For information: Mr M Fenaughty

17.2 Monash University Research Committee Meeting 5/2008

Academic Board received and noted the Report of Meeting 5/2008 of the Monash University Research Committee.

For information: Mr K Williamson

17.3 Research Graduate School Committee Meetings 6 - 7/2008

Academic Board received and noted the Report of Meetings 6 and 7/2008 of the Research Graduate School Committee.

For information: Ms A Hussar

17.4 General Library Committee Meeting 3/2008

Academic Board received and noted the Report of Meeting 3/2008 of the General Library Committee.

For information: Ms M Miller

18   FACULTY BOARD REPORTS

18.1 Faculty of Information Technology Meeting 4/2008

Academic Board received and noted the Report of Meeting 4/2008 of the Board of the Faculty of Information Technology.

For information: Ms P Graham

18.2 Faculty of Engineering Meeting 4/2008

Academic Board received and noted the Report of Meeting 4/2008 of the Board of the Faculty of Engineering.

For information: Mr R Smiley

18.3 Faculty of Business and Economics Meeting 4/2008

Academic Board received and noted the Report of Meeting 4/2008 of the Board of the Faculty of Business and Economics.

For information: Ms J Perdriau

18.4 Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences Meeting 4/2008

Academic Board received and noted the Report of Meeting 4/2008 of the Board of the Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences .

For information: Ms J Tong

E     ITEMS OF OTHER BUSINESS

19   OTHER BUSINESS

20   NEXT MEETING

The next meeting of the Academic Board will be held on Wednesday 19 November 2008 in the Council Chambers, 1st floor, Building 3a, Clayton Campus commencing at 3.30pm. Refreshments will be served after the November meeting to celebrate the end of the Board’s meeting year.