Committee of Deans Meeting 6-1991
Meeting No. 6/91 of the Committee of Deans was held on Monday, 3 June
1991, in the Council Room, University Offices, at the Clayton campus,
between 2.15 and 4.45 pm.
There were present:
Professor M.I. Logan, Vice-Chancellor, in the Chair
Professor J.A. Hay, Vice-Chancellor (Academic)
Professor G.N. Vaughan, Deputy Vice-Chancellor
Professor T. Kennedy, Pro-Vice-Chancellor
Professor R.J. Pargetter, Dean, Faculty of Arts
Professor J. Miller, Associate Dean, David Syme Faculty of Business
Professor J.R. Greig, Associate Dean, Faculty of Computing and
Information Technology
Professor W.A. Sinclair, Dean, Faculty of Economics Commerce and
Management
Professor D.N. Aspin, Dean, Faculty of Education
Professor W.A. Brown, Acting Dean, Faculty of Engineering
Professor C.R. Williams, Dean, Faculty of Law
Professor R. Porter, Dean, Faculty of Medicine
Professor R.J. Snedden, Dean, Faculty of Professional Studies
Professor I.D. Rae, Dean, Faculty of Science
Apologies were received from Professor C.J. Bellamy, Dean, Faculty of
Computing and Information Technology, Professor P.C. Chandler, Dean, David
Syme Faculty of Business and Professor P.LeP. Darvall, Dean, Faculty of
Engineering.
In attendance were:
Mr A.L. Pritchard, Registrar
Mr P.B. Wade, Comptroller
Mr G.F. Neat, Director of Communications
Mr I.C. Gregory, Secretary
M I N U T E S
48. Minutes
The minutes of Meeting No. 5/91 held on 17 May 1991, copies of which had
been circulated with the agenda, were confirmed and signed.
49. Matters Arising From the Minutes
There were no matters arising from the minutes.
50. Report of the Vice-Chancellor
50.1 Petition to Council
A copy of a memorandum from the Vice-Chancellor to Professor J. Monaghan
in his capacity as convenor of the Teaching and Research Action Group, was
tabled (D26/91). The Committee noted that Council had approved the
recommendations of the Committee of Deans in respect of the establishment of
a sub-committee of the Committee of Deans and had referred the matter to the
next Academic Board. The Committee had a wide ranging discussion over the
issues raised by the Action Group. The Committee resolved that the
sub-committee (Vice-Chancellor, Professors Porter and Pargetter) should seek
a final meeting with the Group now that the protest meeting had been held.
MIL
50.2 Decanal Membership of Council
A paper was tabled (D27/91) at the meeting from the Vice-Chancellor
proposing a division of faculties into quasi non-laboratory/laboratory
groups and that representation of Deans on Council rotate in alphabetical
order allowing for the facts that the Deans of Law and Engineering have had
quite lengthy terms on Council and that the Deanship of Computing &
Information Technology has not yet been finalised. The division of faculties
is as follows:
Arts Computing & Information Technology
Business Engineering
ECOM Medicine
Education Professional Studies
Law Science
The Committee of Deans therefore recommended the membership on Council of
Professor Pargetter to 30 June 1993 and Professor Porter to 30 June 1992.
51. Urgent Matters
51.1 University Profiles
The Committee was informed that a paper on profiles should be available
by the next Committee of Deans as the matter was being considered by the
Central Budgets Committee on 4 June and a DEET visit was expected in July to
negotiate profiles. The University was required to make a submission by the
end of June.
51.2 Development Fund
Approximately $M2 was retained in the development fund. It was proposed
to retain $M1 to support any successful CRC proposals which would allow $M1
to be made available for distribution. The Comptroller informed the
Committee that the normal University policy was to guarantee funding for
research projects for a two year period. After discussing alternative
procedures for distributing the funds, it was agreed to obtain bids from
Deans who would consult with departmental heads. The bids from the Deans
should contain comments concerning how the research projects would fit into
the academic planning of faculties and whether the projects had faculty
support. It was noted that there could be some attractive across faculty
proposals and others might be University initiatives proposed centrally.
51.3 Equipment Allocation
It was noted that a small sub-committee comprising Professors Sinclair,
Darvall and Bellamy has been established to consider a formula or mechanism
for the distribution of equipment grants. The Comptroller reported that a
timetable was being produced which would indicate when information from the
sub-committee would be required. It was noted that there was a carry forward
of unspent funds, much of which was committed, from 1990 to 1991 which was
noticeably higher than the carry forward from 1989 to 1990.
51.4 Procedures for Budget, Equipment, and Research Funding
The Comptroller informed the meeting that a timetable was being compiled
which would include procedures for budget, equipment, and research funding
that would result in funds being allocated by the end of the year and allow
time for discussion on the proposed allocations.
52. Research Matters
The Committee of Deans was informed by the Vice-Chancellor that
Co-operative Research Centre proposals were currently being examined. The
Committee also noted that of some 280 ARC submissions, about 100 had not
been accepted so that approximately 180 remained and this was considerably
higher than at the same stage last year. A memorandum had recently been sent
to Deans concerning the matter.
53. Overenrolment
The Committee of Deans received a paper from Professor Williams which had
been deferred from the previous meeting (D16/91). The Comptroller informed
the meeting that a paper containing the official statistics of enrolments as
at 31 March would be submitted to the Central Budgets Committee meeting on 4
June and this would be forwarded to the next meeting of the Committee of
Deans. The Committee discussed a number of reasons for the 1991 overload but
agreed to defer further consideration of the steps that might be taken to
prevent a re-occurrence of the situation in 1992 pending the receipt of
official enrolment statistics.
54. Sir Hayden Starke Chair of Law
The Committee received a proposal from Professor Williams to fill the
vacant Sir Hayden Starke Chair of Law which had been deferred from the
previous meeting (D17/91). The Committee agreed to recommend to the Academic
Board that the Chair be advertised.
55. Establishment of Chair of Hospital and Community Psychiatry,
Alfred Hospital
The Committee received a paper from the Dean of the Faculty of Medicine
recommending the advertising of a Chair of Hospital and Community Psychiatry
(D20/91). The Committee of Deans agreed to recommend that the Academic Board
approve the proposal.
56. Chair in Chemical Engineering
The Committee of Deans received a proposal from the Dean of the Faculty
of Engineering for the filling of a Chair in Chemical Engineering (D21/91).
The Committee agreed to recommend that the Academic Board approve the
proposal.
57. Staff Development for Senior Academic Staff
The Committee received a paper from Professor Rae which had been deferred
from the last meeting of the Committee of Deans D19/91). The Committee
agreed with the desirability of a training programme for senior academic
staff and Professor Miller undertook to prepare a proposal on behalf of the
David Syme Faculty of Business. The Committee considered that some funds
should be made available for such training. It was further agreed that Staff
Development and HEARU should be involved in the training process. Professor
Rae indicated that he would pursue the matter in respect of his faculty.
58. Monash Departmental Scholarships and Monash Research Scholarships
A paper submitted by Professor Hay from Professor A.J. Duggan, Chairman
PhD and Research (Scholarship) Committee was received (D22/91). Members
expressed concern at the examples contained in the paper. The Committee
resolved to refer the matter to faculties with comments being forwarded to
the Committee of Deans.
59. Training Guarantee Act
The Committee received a proposal from Professor Hay concerning the
inter-relationship of the Training Guarantee Act and Outside Studies
Programmes (D23/91). The Committee noted the paper and the necessity for
certification that Outside Studies Programmes would meet the requirements of
the Act.
60. Semesters
The Committee of Deans received a paper from Professor Hay concerning
semester arrangements (D24/91). The Committee resolved to refer the matter
to faculties for comment with responses being forwarded to Professor Hay who
would report on the matter to the Committee of Deans. It was agreed that
responses should be obtained within a period of one month.
61. Responsibility of Individual Officers of the University with
Respect to Compliance with OHS Legislation
The Committee of Deans received a paper submitted by Professor Vaughan
(D25/91). The Committee resolved to refer the matter to Heads of Departments
for advice and that comments should be forwarded to Professor Vaughan within
one month.
62. Procedures for Establishing and Advertising Chairs
The Committee of Deans noted that the current procedures for the
establishment of a chair, or the advertising of a vacant chair, was a three
step process involving the obtaining of preliminary approval from the
Committee of Deans, a recommendation from the Faculty Board, final approval
from the Committee of Deans following which the matter was referred to the
Academic Board and Council for approval. The Committee agreed to change the
procedure so that recommendations would be forwarded to the Committee of
Deans in the first instance for approval, following approval by the
Committee of Deans the matter would be considered by the relevant Faculty
Board, and recommendations should be forwarded to the Academic Board and
Council by inclusion in the report from the Faculty Board.
Next Meeting
The next meeting of the Committee of Deans will be held on Tuesday, 25
June commencing at 2.15 pm in the James McNeill Room.
|