Committee of Deans Meeting 9-1991
Meeting No. 9/91 of the Committee of Deans was held on Tuesday, 25 June
1991, in the James McNeill Room, University Offices, at the Clayton campus,
at 12.30 pm.
There were present:
Professor M.I. Logan, Vice-Chancellor, in the Chair (for items 69-72)
Professor J.A. Hay, Deputy Vice-Chancellor (Academic) in the Chair (for
all other items)
Professor G.N. Vaughan, Deputy Vice-Chancellor
Professor T. Kennedy, Pro-Vice-Chancellor
Professor R.J. Pargetter, Dean, Faculty of Arts
Professor P. Chandler, Dean, David Syme Faculty of Business
Professor C.J. Bellamy, Dean, Faculty of Computing and Information
Technology
Professor W.A. Sinclair, Faculty of Economics Commerce and Management
Professor D.N. Aspin, Dean, Faculty of Education
Professor P.LeP. Darvall, Dean, Faculty of Engineering
Professor C.R. Williams, Dean, Faculty of Law
Professor R. Porter, Dean, Faculty of Medicine
Professor R.J. Snedden, Dean, Faculty of Professional Studies
Professor I.D. Rae, Dean, Faculty of Science
In attendance were:
Mr A.L. Pritchard, Registrar
Mr P.B. Wade, Comptroller
Ms E. Anderson, Executive Assistant to the Vice-Chancellor
Mr J. White, Associate Comptroller
Mr B. O'Mara, Deputy Comptroller
Mr J.R. Trembath, Director, Buildings & Development Branch
Mr I.C. Gregory, Secretary
Ms S. Kerr, Assistant Manager, Budget Branch
Mr G. Neat, Director Communications
M I N U T E S
67. Minutes
The minutes of Meeting No. 8/91 held on 20 June 1991, were not circulated
due to a breakdown in the Printing Department.
ICG
68. Matters Arising from the Minutes
There were no matters arising.
69. Report of the Vice-Chancellor
69.1 Indexing Cost of Core Materials
The attached memorandum from the University Librarian was received
(D34/91) which had been submitted by the Vice-Chancellor.
After discussing the matter, the Committee agreed that the memorandum
should be considered as a bid for funds and taken into account in the
deliberations for the 1992 budget allocations.
PBW
69.2 Intake Quotas for 1992
The Vice-Chancellor informed the Committee that the Victorian
Vice-Chancellors Committee was proposing to issue a statement to the effect
that it was not expected that the numbers of school leavers in 1992 to be
admitted to universities would be significantly different than in 1991. The
Committee noted that this was probably an accurate forecast for Monash given
the likely intake load.
69.3 Teaching Research Action Group
The Committee noted that the Report of the Academic Board Report to
Council would contain a report on action taken in respect of the Teaching
Research Action Group in addition to initiatives that were already in train
related to matters raised by the Group. The Committee agreed to endorse a
statement to be made at the Council meeting by the Vice-Chancellor as
follows:
MIL
`The Committee of Deans notes that its three-person ad hoc
sub-committee (Vice-Chancellor, Dean of Arts and Dean of Medicine), approved
by Council, met for two, two-hour, positive and constructive sessions with
representatives of the Teaching and Research Action Group on 30 May and 7
June 1991. Prior to this, the Vice- Chancellor met with representatives of
the Group on 10 May 1991.
The Committee also notes that some of the matters raised by the Group
were already under consideration by the Vice-Chancellor and by Deans.
The Committee further notes the overwhelming support given to the paper
presented by the Vice-Chancellor to the Academic Board on 12 June 1991.
The Committee of Deans reaffirms the principle that all matters bearing
upon the academic well-being of the University should be discussed within
the context of the existing appropriate structures, namely meetings of
Departments and Schools, Faculty Boards, the Committee of Deans and the
Academic Board before referral to Council.'
The Committee also agreed that meetings of the Committee of Deans should
be held more frequently than three weekly as currently scheduled, preferably
held fortnightly on Tuesday afternoons. The Secretary, noting this and other
constraints, was asked to prepare an appropriate schedule.
ICG
The Vice-Chancellor requested the advice of the Deans in respect of ways
of improving communications with staff. Consideration was given to the
possibility of meetings with Heads of Departments, attending departmental
meetings, attending faculty meetings and so on. It was noted that as the
size, structure and organisation of each faculty varied, each Dean should
consider appropriate ways of involving the Vice-Chancellorate in discussions
within faculties, such views to be forwarded to the Vice-Chancellor.
Deans
69.4 Academic Salaries
The Vice-Chancellor reported to the meeting that Commissioner Frawley had
completed the report of his inquiry into academic salaries. His report
contained a summary of submissions received but no recommendations for
revised salary scales. The report would proceed to the Full Bench which
would conduct a further inquiry. Noting this, and the break out of
industrial action in New South Wales, the Committee expressed grave concern
with these developments, supporting the Vice-Chancellor's view about the
poor state of academic salaries and delayed processes to lifting them.
70. Urgent Matters
70.1 Christmas Shutdown
The Committee agreed with a proposal from the Registrar that the
University would shutdown at the close of business on Monday, 24 December
and reopen on Thursday, 2 January.
ALP
70.2 Membership of Council
The Committee noted that elections had been finalised for the Professors,
non- Professorial Academic Staff, General Staff, Graduates of the
University, and for one Graduate Student member of Council. Elections will
be held for two undergraduate positions in the first week of second
semester. It was anticipated that the Governor in Council would approve the
nominated members.
70.3 Review of Resources in Faculty Offices
The Registrar informed the Committee that a review was being initiated to
review the work in faculty offices, especially as a result of a number of
tasks being devolved to faculties from central administration. The review
would be undertaken by Mr Lionel Parrott with access to a Reference Group
likely to contain Professor Bernard Barry and Ms V. Kelly and a member of
the Comptroller's staff. Terms of reference for the review were being
written which would include an assessment of workloads in faculty offices
and work practices. The review would include a consideration of whether
there were elements of undue duplication between faculty offices and the
University central administration and for the appropriate scheduling of
administrative activities. It would involve central staff as well as faculty
staff, with a view to ascertaining if any central staff could be made
available to assist faculties during busy periods. The review would involve
interviews with Assistant Registrars, faculty administrative staff, Deans
and other relevant staff to make an assessment of workloads and practices.
It was also noted that the devolvement of some tasks to faculties had
involved additional administrative work for Departments.
The Committee requested the Registrar to prepare a paper for the next
meeting, the paper to comment on the possible need for additional resources
given impending budget discussions.
ALP
70.3 Early Retirement
The Committee discussed the early retirement scheme and noted the varying
numbers of applications that were being received in areas of the University.
It was also noted that the head of the budgetary unit in which an applicant
was located was required to certify that the early retirement was in the
interests of the Unit. It was further noted that a person could not be
denied early retirement on the grounds of lack of funding. The Comptroller
agreed that he would look at possible sources of additional funding for the
early retirement scheme, including the possibility of making loans available
to faculties and other budgetary groups if it was a once-only scheme.
PBW
71. Research Matters
The attached paper (D43/91) was tabled by Professor Vaughan. The
Committee noted the information.
GNV
72. Budget for 1992
72.1 Tabled Papers
The Comptroller tabled a paper (D44/91) relating to the budget for 1992 -
1992 Distribution of 205 EFTSU Growth
The Comptroller reminded the meeting that at the last meeting it had been
agreed that a commencing target of 7842 EFTSU was likely to be approved by
DEET but that negotiations would commence by asking for a reduced target of
7500. DEET had proposed an increased funded load for 1992 of 205 EFTSU and
that in a recent DEET paper, an allocation of the additional commencing
students was suggested.
Professor Sinclair considered that the proposal to allocate a commencing
target on the same basis as for 1991 should be reconsidered as the Faculty
of Economics Commerce and Management had been given the largest reduction in
commencing numbers despite having the third highest cutoff score for
admission in the University. However, at a previous meeting, the Committee
had agreed to the same target and distribution between faculties being
adopted in 1992 as applied in 1991 and this decision was endorsed.
The Committee discussed how the 205 additional funded places might be
allocated and it was noted that the University had previously indicated to
DEET the intention to expand higher degree numbers. The Committee also
discussed the necessity for growth in the Distance Education Centre and the
desirability of making provision for new initiatives. The Comptroller
informed the meeting that the figures were needed by 12 noon on 26 June in
order for the profiles to be completed on time.
The Committee noted the suggestions of the Deans and agreed that the
allocation should be resolved by the Vice-Chancellor and the Deputy
Vice-Chancellors.
PBW
72.2 Total Bid for 1994
The meeting discussed the number of additional funded EFTSU figures that
should be requested for 1994. The meeting agreed that additional numbers
should be sought to provide for growth in certain areas of the University
including honours courses in the new faculties, growth of postgraduate
numbers, the Distance Education Centre, and for a number of other
initiatives.
PBW
72.3 Capital Bid 1994
The Comptroller asked the Committee for recommendations in respect of the
1994 capital bid in respect of new buildings and the 1993 bids which had not
been successful and whether these should be brought forward for 1994.
Priorities for the 1994 bids also needed to be set.
Professor Hay suggested that the unsuccessful number two priority for
1993, a Computing and Robotics building at Caulfield of $5.2 million, should
become the new number one priority and Student Residences at Gippsland the
number 2 priority for 1994. Professor Chandler mentioned that the small area
of Caulfield campus necessitated large buildings. Professor Porter suggested
that further consideration should be given to the TAFE linkage and the
proposal for a development at Berwick should be followed up. Professor
Bellamy reminded the meeting of the space assessment presented to the last
meeting and the deficiency/surpluses across the university. He also
requested that thought be given to the refurbishment of F block at Caulfield
campus which would cost in the vicinity of $8 million. The Committee noted
other needs for refurbishment including fume cupboards in Science. Mr Wade
said that it was difficult to get DEET to provide funds for refurbishment
but a request might still be made.
Professor Sinclair informed the meeting that the Faculty of Economics
Commerce and Management had expressed a strong preference for the location
of the Graduate School of Management to remain at Clayton campus. The
Committee was informed that both the present director and the former
director had previously written letters in which they expressed strong
support for the Caulfield campus. The Comptroller reported that following
the receipt of these letters from Professors Barry and Fels there had been a
reallocation of building priorities of $2 million from Frankston and $2
million from Clayton which were included in the submission for DEET as part
of the submission for a building at Caulfield to include the Graduate School
of Management. The Committee also noted the possibility that if the Graduate
School of Management was not relocated to Caulfield, then Frankston campus
might press for a resurrection of its original building allocation and that
if the University had to renegotiate the matter of the new building with
DEET, it was possible that the capital programme might be seriously
jeopardised. The Committee agreed that the matter of the location of the
Graduate School of Management should not be allowed to undermine the success
of submissions for Commonwealth funding for the capital works programme of
the University.
The Committee agreed to support the number two priority from 1993 as the
number one bid for 1994 and that the number two priority (1994) should be
accommodation at Gippsland. The Committee also agreed to request a
substantial sum for refurbishment.
PBW
The Committee noted the information and agreed to the priorities outlined
above.
73. Nomenclature of Degrees
The attached paper was received from the Registrar (D35/91)
relating to nomenclature of degrees. The Committee of Deans endorsed the
proposal in principle noting that it could create some difficulties for the
Faculty of Arts. The Committee agreed that the proposal should flow on to
Academic Board.
ICG
74. Work of the Committee of Deans
The attached memorandum (D36/91) submitted by Professor Williams
was received. In speaking to his memorandum, Professor Williams outlined
three main areas that he wished considered including necessity for change,
how changes could take place and how well the Committee of Deans was
functioning. After discussing the matter, the Committee agreed to request
Professor Williams to prepare a position paper for a future meeting of the
Committee.
CRW
75. Chair in Education
The attached paper was received from Professor Aspin (D37/91)
giving notice that his faculty wished to make a professorial appointment in
Education. He informed the Committee that Professor M.E. Poole had been
employed at the Queensland University of Technology on a probationary basis
which was required under the Public Service Regulations in Queensland and
consequently, her formal resignation was not expected until March 1992.
Nevertheless, he wished to receive permission to fill the Chair so it could
be advertised immediately the resignation was received. The Committee agreed
to recommend that, subject to Professor Poole's resignation and the
availability of funds, the Chair should be advertised. The Committee further
agreed that the approval of the advertising of the Chair subject to
Professor Poole's resignation, should not be seen as creating a precedent in
regard to advertising positions prior to the occupant resigning or granting
a person leave without pay whilst they served a probationary period at
another institution.
DNA
76. Chair in Applied Mathematics
The attached paper was received from Professor Rae (D38/91)
regarding the filling of a Chair in Applied Mathematics. The Committee
agreed to endorse the proposal noting that the Bureau of Meteorology would
be contributing funds toward the cost of the Chair.
IDR
77. Library Provision in Higher Education
The attached paper from the University Librarian was received from
the Registrar (D39/91) containing comments on the report of the Working
Party on Library Provision in Higher Education Institutions.
The Committee endorsed the paper and agreed that the paper be referred to
Deans who should refer it to the appropriate members of their faculties.
Deans
78. Acting Professors, Associate Professors and Acting Associate
Professors
The Committee received the attached paper (D40/91) from Professor
Hay concerning Acting Professors, Associate Professors and Acting Associate
Professors. Following a lengthy discussion, the Committee of Deans approved
the proposal in the paper that Associate Professors and Acting Associate
Professors not be entitled to the title `Professor' but that all Professors
(including Honorary, Adjunct, Personal, Acting Professors, Professorial
Fellows) could use the title of Professor. Acting Associate Professors when
appointed could use the title Associate Professor.
ALP
79. Information Flow, Assistant Registrars and Faculty Board Meetings
The attached paper was received from Professor Hay (D41/91)
relating to improved information flow between faculties and central
administration for the information of Deans.
In speaking to his paper, Professor Hay said that with the expansion of
the University to ten faculties plus MUCG, the number of faculty board
papers was too large for the senior administrators in the University to read
in detail. As a result, he reported that the Assistant Registrars
(Faculties) had agreed with his invitation to draw to his attention any
policy or other matters which would be of interest to the senior
administrators as part of the current attempts to improve communications in
the University.
The Deans were generally not in favour of this suggestion in the light of
the already busy workloads of the Assistant Registrars and a lengthy
discussion took place about possible alternative procedures. One alternative
mooted was for regular meetings to be held with individual Deans. There was
further discussion about information being communicated from the Deans to
faculty staff through such avenues as faculty meetings.
Next Meeting
The next meeting of the Committee of Deans will be held on Tuesday, 16
July 1991 at 2.15 pm.
|