Committee of Deans Meeting 9-1992
Meeting No. 9/92 of the Committee of Deans was held on Tuesday, 14 July
1992, in the Clayfield Room, Boykett Building, at the Caulfield campus,
between 2.15 and 4.00 pm.
There were present:
Professor R. Porter, Acting Vice-Chancellor, in the Chair
Professor R.J. Pargetter, Deputy Vice-Chancellor and Dean of the Faculty
of Arts
Professor L.H.T. West, Pro-Vice-Chancellor (Internat'l Programs and
Development)
Professor J.O. Miller, Acting Dean, David Syme Faculty of Business
Professor C.J. Bellamy, Dean, Faculty of Computing and Information
Technology
Professor W.A. Sinclair, Dean, Faculty of Economics Commerce and
Management
Professor D.N. Aspin, Dean, Faculty of Education
Professor P.LeP. Darvall, Dean, Faculty of Engineering
Professor C.R. Williams, Dean, Faculty of Law
Professor R.J. Snedden, Dean, Faculty of Professional Studies
Professor I.D. Rae, Dean, Faculty of Science
Professor C.B. Chapman, Dean, Victorian College of Pharmacy
Apologies were received from Professor M.I. Logan and Professor T.
Kennedy
In attendance were:
Mr J.R. Leicester, Acting Registrar
Mr J.S. White, Acting Comptroller
Ms C.E. Anderson, Advisor to the Vice-Chancellor
Mr M.D. Watson, Secretary
M I N U T E S
66. Membership
In opening the meeting, Professor Porter welcomed Professor Colin
Chapman, Dean of the Victorian College of Pharmacy, as a member of the
Committee.
67. Minutes
The Minutes of Meeting No. 7/92 held on 23 June and the Special MDW
Meeting held on 2 July, copies of which had been circulated, were confirmed
and signed, subject to the substitution of `1995' for `1992'
in line 3, paragraph 2 of minute 65.
68. Matters Arising From the Minutes
68.1 Clinical Nursing
As foreshadowed at Meeting No. 7/92, Minute 57.2, Professor RP Porter
tabled papers relating to a proposal to establish a Centre for Clinical
Nursing and Chair of Clinical Nursing that had been approved by the Board of
the Faculty of Medicine and which the Academic Board was to be asked to
approve on the following day subject to the endorsement of the Committee of
Deans. Such endorsement was given after Professor Snedden had reiterated his
view that the initiative would not preempt the development of graduate
programs by the University's two existing Schools of Nursing, and after the
meeting accepted that exceptional circumstances had determined the somewhat
precipitate nature of the approval process.
68.2 Outside Earnings Levy
In response to a question from Professor Darvall, Mr White JSW said a
firm proposal on a revised collection procedure for the outside earnings
levy, as foreshadowed at Meeting No. 7/92, Minute 56.1, was not yet ready
for submission to the Committee. He noted the firm view of Deans that fees
income from continuing education short courses and funds put through the
University's books for purely `housekeeping' purposes should quite properly
be exempt from the levy.
68.3 Student Load
Professor Darvall said he was still awaiting budgetary redress in JSW
regard to the situation discussed at Meeting No. 7/92, Minute 56.3, for the
overenrolment of returning students in his faculty. Mr White took note of a
call for a paper to be submitted for prior consideration to a later meeting
addressing the whole question of discrepancies between centrally formulated
planning targets and actual commencing and continuing load. Mr White also
took note of requests from Deans for earlier JSW assessments and
disbursement of overseas student fees income. He undertook to have a paper
prepared for consideration at a later meeting of the Committee. 69.
Vice-Chancellor's Report In his absence, the Committee received and
noted a report from RJP Professor Logan that was tabled at the meeting
covering Superannuation, Open Learning Initiative, and
Competencies etc. On this latter issue, it was agreed that Professor
Pargetter should discuss with Professor Logan the best way for the
University to proceed in developing a firm position and action strategy.
70. Urgent Matters
70.1 VPSEC Report on Business
Professor Miller drew attention to and corrected recent inaccurate
reporting in the press on the range of first-year programs offered by the
David Syme Faculty of Business. He said steps had been taken which he hoped
would set the public record straight.
70.2 New Course Proposals
In response to a question from Professor Miller, the Committee discussed
the debate that had occurred at the previous meeting of Council about the
presentation of new course proposals, and about the academic rigour of one
new Masters program in particular. The general view of Deans was that, given
the documentation before it, Council's concerns were not without substance
and that it was proper that the Academic Board would be addressing them on
the following day.
70.3 Continuing Education
Professor Aspin gave notice that he would be submitting a paper to a DNA
later meeting as a means of initiating the review of the current
administration of continuing education in the University as provided for in
the EURACE report.
70.4 Property Acquisitions
Mr White informed the meeting that, despite some rather unfortunate
recent publicity, the acquisition by the University of the Bushells factory
and the old drive-in theatre site on the periphery of the Clayton campus
were not yet `sewn up' and, as such, should be regarded as commercial in
confidence.
70.5 Gippsland Integration Project
Professor Pargetter reported that the Gippsland integration project was
close to completion and that he expected a full package of constituent
agreements to be submitted to the August meeting of the Academic Board.
70.6 Art and Design Review
Professor Pargetter gave notice that an interim report of the Art and
Design Review Committee was now complete with its final report expected to
be submitted to the August meeting of the Academic Board.
71. Heads of Department
The Committee considered the attached discussion paper, RJP
D45/92, submitted by Professor Pargetter and arrived at the initial view
that it favoured a slight moderation of the existing provisions governing
headship of departments with a clarification of the discretionary role of
Deans and the Vice-Chancellor that would allow more flexibility to be
adopted by individual faculties as they chose. It was agreed that Professor
Pargetter should bring a paper to this effect to a later meeting.
72. Research Performance Indicators
The Committee discussed the attached correspondence between RP
Professor Larkins of the University of Melbourne and Professor Porter,
D46/92, and identified numerous difficulties - principally definitional - in
proceeding as proposed. It was agreed that Professor Porter should, in
guardedly positive fashion, inform Professor Larkins of the Deans' initial
response and invite him to present his proposal in more detail in due
course.
Matters Pending
The Committee was advised that the following matter was not yet ready for
attention:
Meeting Minute Paper Action
Appraisal of Deans 1/92 4.9 MIL
Next Meeting
Members were reminded that the next ordinary meeting of the Committee was
scheduled to be held on Tuesday, 4 August 1992, in Room 272 on the
second floor of the Humanities Building, at Clayton, commencing at
2.15 pm.
|