Skip to content | Change text size
Assets | Includes | header.shtml
 

Committee of Deans Meeting 15/97

Meeting 15/97 of the Committee of Deans was held at 2.15 pm on Tuesday, 2 December 1997 in the Sir George Lush Room, Ground Floor, University Offices Building 3a, Clayton Campus.

Tony Calder
Secretary

MINUTES

1. Attendance and apologies

Professor G Webb was in attendance for item 3.1.

Mr P Summers and Mr J White were in attendance for item 4.1.

Mr P Annal was in attendance for item 5.1.

Professor G Davison and Professor B Caine were in attendance for item 6.1.

2. Minutes

The minutes of meeting 14/97 were confirmed.

3. Matters arising from the minutes not dealt with elsewhere in the agenda

3.1 Induction to Teaching for new Academic Staff

Professor Graham Webb was in attendance for this item.

A paper titled, Induction to Teaching for New Academic Staff, was discussed at the Committee of Deans meeting 13/97 (refer document D67/97). A discussion paper extending issues raised at that meeting and by Deans in subsequent discussions with Professor Webb was attached (D71/97).

During extensive discussion, the following suggestions were made in relation to the items raised on page two of paper D71/97. A variety of views were expressed and have been noted as a means for furthering development of the proposal:

1. A Graduate Certificate in Higher Education would be a viable option. It would be the equivalent of six months duration (full time) but should be modularised to increase flexibility.

2. Noting the primary role of CHED in the design, management and coordination of the Graduate Certificate, it was proposed that:

(a) The course proposal should follow existing course approval processes and be progressed via the Faculty of Education Board in the first instance.

(b) It was proposed that a CHED staff member be specified as Program Leader but that future iterations of the proposal would need to clarify that staff member’s relationship with the Faculty of Education.

(c) That a Program Committee (Management Committee), with broad based faculty representation, be established. Such a Committee could oversee the ongoing development of the program and facilitate consideration of general and specific requirements raised by faculties.

(d) The Committee was advised that development of the program in flexible mode(s) was a current consideration but that pressing time constraints may initially restrict the progress of this aspect of the development.

3. On the subject of a reporting relationship over and above normal Faculty of Education requirements, a view was expressed that existing reporting via the faculty would be sufficient provided the Program Committee (Management Committee) was representative of all faculties.

4, 5 & 6 Participation in the Certificate should be seen as part of staff/career development for Monash staff.

The course could be offered to staff at other Universities on a fee paying basis.

It was suggested that a suitable compromise may be required in order to encompass faculty requirements and make the course content attractive to external fee paying participants.

Establishing the course as a full fee paying course would make it competitive with other similar external courses.

Scholarships, if made available, should be made available to all academic staff, not restricted to new academic staff.

7. The view was expressed that an incentive for completion of the Certificate should not be offered. Suitable consideration would be given as part of the appraisal and promotion procedures.

8. The Committee was advised that initial financing of the program would require funding of a Coordinators position in CHED and a one-off materials production grant. This was based on the expectation that the Faculty of Education would supply some teaching support. In addition, it was noted that the financing requirements would become more apparent once the outstanding queries had been resolved.

9. No statements were made in relation to this point.

10 The view was expressed that participation should not be a contractual requirement for new academic staff. It was suggested that the process needed to be flexible and that participation in the program would be favourably viewed when matters relating to probation, tenure and contract renewals were being discussed.

Professor Webb was invited to submit further iterations of the document to the Committee once the matters raised in discussion had been progressed.

3.2 Research Quantum - distribution of additional sum

A discussion paper was attached (D72/97).

Following extensive discussion of the matter, it was agreed that Professor Darval would supply Deans with the following tables for comparison:

(i) distribution of research funds as per Professor Whites paper

(ii) distribution of research funds as per the current formula

(iii) distribution of research funds as per the formula proposed in discussion paper D72/97

4. Vice-Chancellor’s business

4.1 Peninsula Campus

A report titled Development of the Peninsula Campus was attached (D73/97).

Mr Peter Summers was in attendance.

During discussion, the following items of significance were raised:

Item Explanation/inclusion
2.2.9 Graduate Certificate of Health and Medical Informatics. It was suggested that the Dean of Information Technology be included under the column Possible Management Responsibilities.
2.2.13 Bachelor of Health Management. It was suggested that the Dean of Business and Economics be included under the column Possible Management Responsibilities
2.2.53 This matter is to be the subject of further discussion between Mr White, the DVC (A&P) and representatives from the Faculty of Arts. Once the proposals are finalised, application for funding via the Strategic Innovation Fund can be made.

The Committee was advised that applications for funding via the Strategic Innovations Fund would be called for mid way through 1998, that the $300,000 budget allocation to support Peninsula Campus activities was a one-off allocation and that Peninsula programs could compete for the remaining unallocated student load for the year 2000.

2.2.63 Following a query on summer programs, the Committee was advised that Deans would specify the campus location for summer programs.

Mr White suggested that the wording of recommendation 2.2.63 could be further clarified and agreed to write to Deans on the matter.

2.7.12 It was noted that it would be difficult to meet the proposed timeline of the first quarter of 1998. It was suggested that the matter be further reviewed and then referred to the appropriate person(s) for attention as soon as practicable.
1.2.1 Table 4

The Committee was advised that the Faculty of Education had reduced the number of A.Prof/Reader staff to three and that the professorial staff member was no longer based at Peninsula.

The need for senior faculty staff and leadership at Peninsula was further discussed.

4.2 Deputy Vice-Chancellor (Research and Development)

4.2.1 Y2K - Year 2000 compliance

Deans were invited to access the following web page to obtain the latest information on this important subject.

http://www.adm.monash.edu.au/y2k/

4.3 Deputy Vice-Chancellor (International and Public Affairs)

4.3.1 Progress on international related matters

Professor Maloney advised the Committee that a decision from the Malaysian Government was expected in the near future. In addition, Professors White and Harris had recently returned from a visit to South Africa where Monash was continuing to explore avenues of involvement in the South African educational sector.

The Committee was advised that faculty nominated Associated Deans - International (titles may vary between faculties) would be submitted to the next meeting of Council.

4.4 Deputy Vice-Chancellor (Academic and Planning)

4.4.1 Monash University Aboriginal Programs

A report on Monash Indigenous programs, undertaken by consultants Professor Colin Bourke and Associate Professor Eleanor Bourke, was attached (D74/97). A further paper containing an analysis of issues raised in the report was distributed to members prior to the meeting (D79/97).

Professor Lindsay introduced the item and indicated that the Committee’s endorsement of Recommendation 2 would enable the matter Aboriginal education at Monash to be progressed. Contingent on endorsement of Recommendation 2, the appointed senior indigenous academic would then be accountable for refining and actioning the remaining recommendations, in consultation with stakeholders.

Following discussion, the Committee endorsed Recommendation 2.

4.5 General Manager

4.5.1 Enterprise Bargaining

Mr Wade advised the Committee that negotiations were still underway but that unless the outstanding matters were resolved within the next few days then any final agreement could not be put to a vote by staff until the new year.

5. Matters raised by Deans

5.1 Computer Laboratories

A discussion paper (D75/97) was attached. Mr Peter Annal was in attendance for this item.

Professor Rosenberg introduced the item by advising the Committee that the discussion paper, produced at the request of UNITAC, raised issues relating to the increasing cost of maintaining the Universities computing infrastructure, the possible role of Internet Service Providers, the implications of universal access to computers by students, the use and ‘ownership’ of computer laboratories at Monash, the decreasing retail cost of computing equipment and the need to progress the debate on the use of computers in teaching and learning.

In addition, Mr Annal advised members that the results of recent surveys confirmed the trend of high PC ownership among students and that the University was already incurring some costs in this area by assisting students in the resolution of hardware and software problems.

Following further discussion of some of the matters contained in document D75/97, Mr Annal suggested that preliminary work needed to commence shortly in order for a transition plan to be ready by April.

During discussion, the following matters were raised:

  • The Administrative guidelines manual for higher education institutions on HECS and FEES for 1997 states in Section 2 that:

In certain circumstances, higher education institutions may charge students for goods and services which are a component of a course...., this includes equipment regarded as a tool of trade....

however, the position in relation to computing equipment is clarified in a later paragraph were the guidelines state that:

Higher education institutions must not charge a student for goods or services which are required for a course of study.... Cases include .... access to computers or other on-line resources.

This would appear to indicate that the University would need to maintain some PCs on campus for those students not owning a PC.

Given the increasing use of multi-media in teaching and learning and the issues raised in the discussion paper, the Vice-Chancellor agreed to take up the matter with the AVCC.

  • that any changes in access to computing infrastructure needs to consider the special requirements of distance education students and students with disabilities, and
  • the use of PCs to access administrative processes and in examinations needs to be considered.

In summarising the discussion, it was noted that the principal objectives contained in the discussion paper were sound and that even though barriers to their implementation currently existed, the matter needed to resolved via continued refinement of the recommendations contained in the paper and ongoing consultation with interested parties, including the Student Union.

5.2 Establishment of the position of Professor of Surgery, Cabrini Hospital

Attached was a position specification and rationale (D76/97) for a proposal to establish an externally funded position of Professor of Surgery, Cabrini Hospital. The proposal had been endorsed by the Board of the Faculty of Medicine and Academic Board.

The Committee endorsed the proposal.

5.3 Establishment of the position of Professor/Director of Medical Oncology

Attached was a proposal (D77/97) to establish an externally funded position of Professor/Director of Medical Oncology, located at the Monash Medical Centre in the Southern Healthcare Network. The proposal had been endorsed by the Board of the Faculty of Medicine and Academic Board.

The Committee endorsed the proposal.

6. Other business

6.1 Monash University Electronic Publishing Press

A discussion paper was attached (D78/97). Professor Graeme Davison and Professor Barbara Caine were in attendance for this item.

Introducing the matter, Professor Davison noted that the academic monograph was still a significant form of scholarly publication but that publication runs of 500 to 1000 were becoming increasingly uneconomical. In addition, Professor Davison suggested that it may be appropriate for Monash to instigate a process for reviewing how it may best utilise existing and emerging technology in the area of academic publishing.

During discussion of the matter, the following suggestions were made:

  • noting comments by the authors that the proposal was in an early stage of development, it was suggested that a small Working Party be formed to assist the authors with further development of the proposal;
  • given the above suggestion, it was suggested that Professors Davison and Caine co-chair the Working Party and that they may wish to draw on the experience of Associate Professor Zenon Pudlowski and Mr Hans Groenewegan who have previous relevant experience in the area of electronic publishing;
  • Other matters raised included:

(i) the issue of intellectual property needs to be considered

(ii) while many external entities will/currently publish electronically, the quality and name of the Monash publications should enable differentiation

(iii) international partners in the venture may enhance the viability of the project

(iv) a primary objective of the project would be to support academic activities at Monash, particularly those areas where Monash already has an advantage, and

(v) future iterations of the proposal should clarify, where necessary, any possible involvement in the project of the Distance Education Centre and Monash Print Service

7 Items for information

8. Next meeting

The next scheduled Committee of Deans meeting will be held on 27 January 1998 at 2.15pm in the Sir George Lush Room.

Distribution

(Hard copy):

Vice-Chancellor
Deputy Vice-Chancellors
Deans
General Manager
Executive Assistant to Vice-Chancellor