Apologies were received from Professor John Rickard,
Professor Michael Brisk, Professor Colin Chapman and Professor John Redmond.
In attendance as Acting Deans were Professor Gerry
Griffin (Faculty of Business & Economics), Professor Tam Sridhar (Faculty of
Engineering), Professor Peter Stewart – (Faculty of Pharmacy) and Associate
Professor Bernard Hoffert - Faculty of Art & Design.
2 Minutes
The minutes of meeting 6/99 held 17th August
1999 were confirmed.
3 Matters arising from the minutes not dealt with elsewhere in the agenda
3.1. Research Green Paper - New Knowledge, New
Opportunities
Members were advised that a submission on behalf of the
Group of Eight University’s was progressing. Monash was continuing to
emphasis the importance of appropriate performance indicators at a national
level.
4 Vice-Chancellor’s Group
4.1 Vice-Chancellor
4.1.1 Towards the Next Budget
Members received the following papers:
-
Memorandum from the Vice-Chancellor titled Towards
the Next Budget - 2nd draft.
-
Performance Incentive Plan for increasing revenue from
fee (Attachment C- tabled at the meeting).
-
Multiplying Rewards Through the RQ (Attachment D -
tabled at the meeting).
Introducing this matter, the Vice-Chancellor noted that
his memorandum, Towards the Next Budget had been the subject of
previous discussions with Deans and, following consideration of any further
comments from Deans, the next iteration would include all appendices. The
final document would accompany the budget papers through the various
consultative forums and would also be a useful document for Deans to
distribute/reference during discussions with colleagues.
During discussion of the document the following
suggestions were made:
-
that paragraph 4, page 4 conclude with the statement
"in which it will contribute $6.5m."
-
the final paragraph on page 4 include a statement that
it is the "basic disciplines of the Arts and Sciences" that will receive
targeted support; and
-
paragraph 2, page 6, be amended to read "…… including
funding all undergraduate years in the same discipline at the same weight,
except for the Honours year which would have an additional weight of 0.5.
"Other post-graduate courses would normally have the same weight as the
relevant undergraduate course."
Attachment C - Performance Incentive Plan for increasing
revenue from fees.
During discussion the following issues were raised:
-
members were advised that discussion of targets could
occur in relation to targets beyond the year 2000.
-
the high start up costs for fee-paying courses with low
initial student numbers was raised.
-
during discussion, it was suggested income from
consultancy activities be included in next years round of budget
discussions and that, if practicable, a system to confirm fee income from
Short Courses be put in place by June 2000.
Attachment D - Multiplying Rewards Through the RQ.
Introducing the document, Professor Darvall advised Deans
that the proposed model provided further incentives to faculties to improve
research performance.
During discussion the following issues were raised:
-
the possibility of comparing research performance by
faculty across institutions was raised. Several members noted that
accurate data was often difficult to obtain and that it was not
necessarily a meaningful comparison due to the variation of disciplines in
faculties across institutions.
-
it was suggested that the proposed incentives were not
overt enough and that another mechanism for providing incentives was an
"Incentives Pool" where concrete targets were set, and if achieved, a
predetermined reward was obtained - a form of top-slicing within the RQ to
set up the "Incentive Pool".
Following further discussion, Deans were requested to
forward ideas and suggestions to Professor Darvall.
4.1.2 Leading the Way - Communication and Dissemination
The Vice-Chancellor commended all Deans for their efforts
in promoting awareness of Leading the Way - Monash 2000.
In response to a question, the Vice-Chancellor advised
Deans that the University's Annual Report to Parliament and the possibility
of holding an "Annual General Meeting" were under consideration.
4.1.3 Faculty Foundations
Noting that the Boards of Management of most Faculty
Foundations required the Vice-Chancellor or nominee, and/or General Manager
or nominee in their membership provisions, the Vice-Chancellor requested
Deans to consider the option of accepting nomination to other faculty Boards
of Management, particularly in a non-cognate area.
Following acceptance of the proposal, the Vice-Chancellor
advised Deans that he would formally contact them via a memorandum.
4.2 Deputy Vice-Chancellor (Research and Development)
4.3 Deputy Vice-Chancellor (International and Public Affairs)
4.4 Deputy Vice-Chancellor (Academic and Planning)
4.4.1 Enterprise Bargaining
The General Manager introduced discussions noting that
the recent Enterprise Bargaining agreement at the University of Sydney had
introduced some instability into the system. Members were advised that
Professor J Niland, Vice-Chancellor of the University of NSW and Chair of
the Australian Vice-Chancellors' Committee was having discussions with the
Federal Government which may result in some increased support for the
tertiary sector.
In relation to the next round of Enterprise Bargaining at
Monash, members were informed that Monash supported an appropriate wage
increase for staff, preferably funded via increased income levels, and that
realistic figures should be built into all budget projections.
Deans were advised that they would be provided with
regular updates as the negotiations progressed.
4.5 General Manager
4.5.1 Survey of Lecture Theatre Occupancy
A document was attached.
The General Manager, Mr PB Wade, introduced this item.
Following an outline on the background of the paper, Mr
Wade outlined the major issues raised in the paper. These included the low
utilization of non-high-tech theatres (37%) compared to 57% utilization of
high-tech-theatres (over the survey period) and the level of anticipated
utilization/bookings (62.15% of available time-slots) compared to actual
utilization (44.4% actual utilization of booked time-slots).
In summarising the matter, Mr Wade commented that the
University needed to maximise the utilization of existing resources via
integrated planning of resource and academic matters.
Deans were requested to forward comments on the paper to
the Assistant General Manager - Facilities and Services, Mr John Trembath.
5 Matters raised by Deans
5.1 Proposal for a Chair in Meteorology
The Committee endorsed the proposal to advertise and fill
a Chair in Meteorology.
5.2 Director – Monash Environment Institute
The Committee endorsed the proposal to establish,
advertise and fill the position of Director - Monash Environment Institute.
5.3 Proposal to fill a Chair in Computer Science and
Establish a Chair in Distributed Systems
The Committee endorsed the proposal to advertise and fill
a Chair in Computer Science and to establish, advertise and fill a Chair in
Distributed Systems.
6. Other business
7 Items for information
7.1 Update on King's College
Following a recent visit to King's College, Professor
White advised members that his meetings with King's College staff members
had been positive and productive.
Further matters raised during discussion included the
need to increase awareness of the agreement among King's staff and the need
to work toward including mention of the Monash Centre on the King's College
web site.
8. Next meeting
The next ordinary meeting of the Committee of Deans will
be held at 2.15 pm on Tuesday, 16th November 1999 in the Sir
George Lush Room.