Committee of Deans Meeting 1-2000
Meeting 1/2000 of the Committee of Deans was held between
2.15 pm and 4.25 pm on Tuesday, 18th January 2000 in the Sir
George Lush Room, ground floor, University Offices Building 3a, Clayton
Campus.
There were present:
Professor D A Robinson, Vice-Chancellor and President
Professor A W Lindsay, Deputy Vice-Chancellor (Academic and
Planning)
Mr P Marshall, Acting General Manager
Professor J K Redmond, Dean, Faculty of Art and Design
Professor H Le Grand, Dean, Faculty of Arts
Professor J A Rickard, Dean, Faculty of Business and
Economics
Professor D. Gunstone, Acting Dean, Faculty of Education
Professor M L Brisk, Dean, Faculty of Engineering
Professor J Rosenberg, Dean, Faculty of Information
Technology
Professor S Parker, Dean, Faculty of Law
Professor J Davies, Acting Dean, Faculty of Medicine
Professor C Chapman, Dean, Faculty of Pharmacy
In attendance were:
Mr John Levine, Assistant General Manager (Budget &
Statistical Services) for Item 4.4.1
Mr Neil Bradley- for Item 4.3.2
Secretary:
Mr P Siggins, Manager, University Secretariat
MINUTES
In opening the meeting, the Vice-Chancellor welcomed
Professor John Davies, representing the Faculty of Medicine, Professor Homer
Le Grand to his first meeting as Interim Dean, Faculty of Science and Mr
Peter Marshall as Acting General Manager.
1. Apologies
Apologies were received from Professor Peter Darvall and
Professor Nick Saunders.
2. Minutes
The minutes of meeting 8/99 held 16th November
1999 were confirmed subject to minute 6.1-Dean’s power to suspend a
student’s enrolment for health reasons being redrafted in consultation
with Professor Parker to reflect the requirement that the opinion obtained
must support the course of action taken in these cases.
3. Matters arising from the minutes not dealt with elsewhere
in the agenda
Any matters arising were dealt with in the body of the
agenda.
4. Vice-Chancellor’s Group
4.1 Vice-Chancellor
4.1.1 2000: Key Issues
In introducing this item, the Vice-Chancellor identified ten
major issues which would be under consideration in 2000. The Vice-Chancellor
indicated that he hoped that work on each issue might be finalised by
mid-year. The ten issues were as follows:
Governance
Governance and managing Monash in light of our global
developments.
Campus Developments
Clarifying the role of each campus: Campus directional
statements.
Releasing the ‘sleeping value’ of campuses.
Capitalising on our Intellectual Property
Generating a substantial return to individuals and the
University for the massive stock of intellectual property in Monash.
eMonash
Developing Monash as an on-line enterprise.
Brand Monash
Developing, registering and controlling the Monash ‘brand’
globally.
Fundraising
Raising substantial funds for Monash University.
Budget 2001-3
Preparing a sound three year balanced budget.
Managing Off-shore Presences
Clarifying arrangements for management and support of our
off-shore campuses, alliances and centres.
Research Off-shore
Developing our research profile and productivity off-shore.
Key Performance Indicators
Finalising and reporting on a set of University-wide KPIs.
Following his presentation of the major issues for 2000, the
Vice-Chancellor invited discussion. Professor Parker suggested that staff
morale, commitment and motivation was an issue for consideration and that
thought should be given to strategic ways of improving morale. It was agreed
that further consideration would be given to this issue.
4.2 Deputy Vice-Chancellor (Research and Development)
4.3 Deputy Vice-Chancellor (Academic and Planning)
4.3.1 Enterprise Bargaining Update
Mr Peter Marshall spoke to this item. A paper was
distributed setting out the status of negotiations for third round
Enterprise Bargaining in the G08 Universities. Mr Marshall reported on the
current situation with regard to Monash negotiations. At the conclusion of
discussion the Vice-Chancellor commented that there was a need for a
realistic picture across the University as a whole. Mr Marshall agreed to
provide a set of scenarios incorporating the variables identified in
discussion for consideration.
4.3.2 Report From The Dean’s Discussion Group On Issues
Concerning The Science Faculty
The Vice-Chancellor thanked Mr Neil Bradley for the paper,
Report from the Deans Discussion Group on Issues Concerning the Science
Faculty. Professor Lindsay introduced the discussion noting that
Recommendations 2, 5 and 7 have wider implications for the University and
invited members to seek clarification or comment on those recommendations.
Professor Le Grand noted that Recommendation 4 was to be addressed by
colleagues in the Faculty of Science, that under Recommendation 2 the costs
of course administration would need to be taken into account and that a
spirit of cooperation and support from the Faculty of Medicine was evident
and would assist in addressing the loss of teaching load caused by the loss
of service teaching.
In discussion the Vice-Chancellor invited comment on
Recommendation 2. Recommendation 2 identified a need for procedural
guidelines to assist the processes of coordination and load management
between degree owning and service teaching faculties and to limit the
adverse effects of intra-University market behaviour and safeguard the
efficient use of resources while maintaining quality academic programs. Mr
Neil Bradley responded indicating the need for development of the suggested
guidelines. He proposed that he meet with Mr John Levine and Professor
Merran Evans to draft a paper on the matter for consideration by the
Vice-Chancellor’s Group and the Committee of Deans. Mr Bradley’s suggestion
was endorsed and it was agreed that input from Deans would be welcomed.
4.4 Acting General Manager
4.4.1 2001 Budget Briefing
Mr John Levine introduced the paper, 2001 Budget Briefing.
Mr Levine emphasized the anticipated deficit over the three years between
2000-2002, the prospects for Commonwealth assistance towards salary
increases and costs associated with the third round Enterprise Bargaining.
Mr Levine noted that Council had approved the 2000 Budget subject to
measures being put in place to avoid the indicative deficits of 2001 and
2002. As a consequence of Council’s budget resolution, it was necessary for
the University to develop by the end of June 2000, financial plans and the
associated Budget 2001-2003, which would demonstrate the capacity of the
University to operate with a surplus. The key dates of this process would
be:
-
Determination of key budget
drivers in relation to teaching and research dollars end February
-
Determination of Load targets
end March
-
Finalise faculty and academic
support budgets mid June
-
Budget document end June
To ensure a common understanding of how the budget
distributions were determined, a briefing paper would be prepared by early
February for the information of Deans.
In discussion, the Vice-Chancellor emphasized that Council
had by its resolution, set the University the task of demonstrating capacity
to balance its books and operate with a surplus. The build up of a deficit
was unacceptable to the governing body. Accordingly, the Budget would be one
of the key issues for the first half of the year.
5. Matters raised by Deans
5.1 Proposal To Restyle And Fill The Chair Of Jewish
Civilisation
Professor Homer Le Grand spoke to the proposal.
The Committee approved the filling of the Chair of Jewish
Civilisation and the renaming of the Chair as the Sir John Monash Chair of
Jewish Civilisation subject to further clarification and consultation with
relevant parties concerning redesignation of the Chair as the Sir John
Monash Chair of Jewish Civilisation. In this context members noted that
there existed a Sir John Monash Chair of Electrical Power Engineering and a
Sir John Monash Distinguished Professor Award. Professor Lindsay suggested
that thought be given to policy regarding the Distinguished Professor Award.
6. Other business
6.1 Y2K
Professor Chapman suggested that it would be appropriate for
a report on Y2K to be made available and for staff involved in Y2K
preparation to be thanked for their efforts.
6.2 GST
It was agreed that Mr John Matthews, Assistant General
Manager (Financial Services) be invited to the next ordinary meeting of the
Committee of Deans (22nd February) to present advice on
preparations and training in anticipation of the GST.
6.3 Gippsland
The Vice Chancellor advised that a small group would be
established to assist the implementation of Report of the Gippsland Working
Party. The group would comprise three to four people and the Vice-Chancellor
sought the advice of the committee regarding potential members.
6.4 University Practice Policy
Mr Marshall advised that the delivery of the Report had been
temporarily delayed by the need to consider the implications of the GST. It
was agreed that the University Practice Policy would be considered at the
next Deans Discussion Group (1 February).
7. Items for information
7.1 Dean, Faculty of Business and Economics
The Vice-Chancellor advised that the Executive Committee of
Council would shortly receive a recommendation for the appointment of a new
Dean of the Faculty of Business and Economics.
7.2 Monash Mount Eliza Graduate School of Business and
Government Ltd.
The Vice-Chancellor provided an update on negotiations which
had now been concluded and approved by Executive Committee of Council.
7.3 Monash South Africa
The Vice-Chancellor provided an update on developments and
advised that the Monash proposal had been endorsed and received
registration. The situation would now allow for further progress and members
were requested to give thought to making early preparations in case the
University was requested to make a rapid response. The Vice-Chancellor
commented that the London and South Africa initiatives would signal a
significant change in the University’s identity.
8. Next meeting
The next meeting of the Deans Discussion Group will be held
at 4.00 pm on Tuesday, 1st February 2000 in the City Office.
The next ordinary meeting of the Committee of Deans will be
held at 2.15 pm on Tuesday, 22nd February 2000 in the Sir George
Lush Room. |