Committee of Deans Meeting 6/2000
Meeting 6/2000 of the Committee of Deans was held at 2.15 pm
on Tuesday, August 22nd 2000 in the Sir George Lush Room, ground
floor, University Offices Building 3a, Clayton campus.
Tony Calder, Secretary
Minutes
1. There were present:
Professor P LeP Darvall, Deputy
Vice-Chancellor and Vice-President (Research and Development)
Professor A W Lindsay, Deputy
Vice-Chancellor and Vice-President (Academic and Planning)
Ms A Crook, Deputy
Vice-Chancellor and Vice-President (Resources)
Professor J K
Redmond, Dean, Faculty of Art and Design
Professor H Le
Grand, Dean, Faculty of Arts and Interim Dean, Faculty of Science
Professor G Palmer,
Dean, Faculty of Business and Economics
Professor M L Brisk,
Dean, Faculty of Engineering
Professor S Willis,
Dean, Faculty of Education
Professor J
Rosenberg, Dean, Faculty of Information Technology
Professor S Parker,
Dean, Faculty of Law
Professor N
Saunders, Dean, Faculty of Medicine
Professor C Chapman,
Dean, Victorian College of Pharmacy
Ms Natalie Mitchell
Item 4.1.1
Mr Stephen Dee Item
4.1.5
Mr Anthony Pollock
Item 4.1.5
Dr Ilana Snyder Item
4.3.1.1
Associate Professor
Sue Campbell Item 4.3.1.2
Mr Hans Groenewegen
Item 4.4.1
2. Minutes
The Minutes of Meeting 5/2000 of the Committee of Deans held
4th July 2000 were confirmed.
3. Matters Arising from the Minutes not dealt with
elsewhere in the agenda.
3.1 Corporate Brochure
Members were advised that this matter would be progressed
further via the Vice-Chancellor’s Group.
4. Vice-Chancellor’s Group
4.1 Vice-Chancellor and President
4.1.1 University-wide Performance Indicators
Ms Natalie Mitchell was in attendance for this item.
Deans were advised that the distributed paper detailed six
sets of performance indicators for monitoring the University’s overall
performance. Further, it was noted that the performance indicators detailed
in the document were in addition to those developed by faculties and
detailed in Faculty plans and were intended to provide Council, Deans and
senior managers with an overall picture of whether Monash was moving towards
its goals and objectives as set out in Leading the Way – Monash 2020.
During discussion the following matters were raised:
-
the inclusion of publication levels
was discussed but it was noted that the accuracy of the data was variable as
publication data for universities was no longer audited externally;
-
during discussion of patents and
licenses it was noted that as contracts contributed significantly to revenue
streams there may be some utility in comparing growth in this area over
time;
-
as Monash aspires to be both an
international and global University, Monash could develop a set of
indicators benchmarking Monash against other global Universities.
Recognising that this was a difficult task, it was suggested that an initial
step may be to investigate ways of benchmarking areas of Monash activities
with similar activities at Kings College;
-
other suggestions included the need
to measure cooperation across discipline and faculty’s boundaries, identify
and measure the levels of international grants and the possible use of
aggregate data on staff satisfaction levels.
In concluding discussion, Professor Darvall thanked Deans
for their contributions and requested that further suggestions/discussions
be directed to Ms Mitchell.
4.1.2. Deans Special Tasks
· Off-Campus Directional Statement
Following advice that a draft paper would be completed by
September, Deans were requested to forward any additional suggestions to
Professor Rosenberg.
· Learning Subjects Exchange
Deans were advised that a report on this item would be
available at the next meeting.
· Monash Abroad Scheme
Professor Redmond provided an overview of the report and
emphasised the following aspects of the report:
-
Key issues for further consideration
included the need to establish 24 points (whole semester) programs, the
probable need to increase financial incentives to further assist students,
improving exchange agreements, the budget implications of agreed targets
and the role of inter-campus exchanges (Malaysia and South Africa).
Following discussion of the Committee’s responsibilities and
reporting line, Professor Redmond was requested to contact Ms Crook’s Office
regarding the need to include a member from the Corporate Finance Division
on the Committee and to submit a report for consideration by the
Vice-Chancellor’s Group.
4.2 Deputy Vice-Chancellor and Vice-President (Research
and Development)
4.2.1 The Monash Name and Marketing and Recruitment
Members were advised that a preliminary discussion document
titled The Monash Name and Marketing and Recruitment – Discussion had
been emailed to all Deans on Friday 18th August. Further, members
were advised that meetings of the two Working Groups would be convened
shortly.
4.3 Deputy Vice-Chancellor and Vice-President (Academic
and Planning)
4.3.1 Learning and Teaching Plan – Lead Site Presentation
4.3.1.1 Faculty of Education
Dr Illana Synder was in attendance for this item and
presented a report on the development of web-based flexible learning
materials for the Bachelor of Adult Learning. In addition, a second project
team had focused on the development of a web site for the Graduate Diploma
in Education (Secondary).
Professor Darvall thanked Dr Snyder for her presentation on
behalf of the Committee of Deans.
4.3.1.2 Faculty of Law
A paper titled Integration of practical skills and ethics
into the curriculum was distributed..
Associate Professor Sue Campbell was in attendance for this
item and presented a report on integrating skills such as ethics and
communication into the core subjects of the LL.B.
Members were referred to the distributed paper for an
overview of the project methodology adopted by the project team. Further
enquiries should be directed to Professor Campbell.
Professor Darvall thanked Associate Professor Sue Campbell
for her presentation on behalf of the Committee of Deans.
4.3.1.3 Faculty of Pharmacy
Members were advised that this item would be presented to
the next meeting of the Committee of Deans.
4.4 Deputy Vice-Chancellor and Vice-President (Resources)
4.4.1 Digitisation Policy
A document was attached. (Attachment 6)
Mr Hans Groenewegen, Deputy University Librarian was in
attendance for this item.
In providing a framework for discussion of the item, Mr
Groenewegen informed the Committee that the Copyright Act (1968) set limits
on the amount of material that may be from copied from audio and hardcopy
material. Further the Copyright Act (1968) permitted the Copyright Agency
Limited (CAL) to negotiate, on behalf of copyright owners, payment for
copyright materials reproduced for education purposes.
Members were advised that a new Remuneration Agreement was
signed by the AVCC, on behalf of twenty-nine Universities, and CAL. Key
features included:
-
the agreement covers digitisation in
addition to photocopying of copyright materials;
-
the remuneration level payable by
each University to CAL was fixed at $25 per EFTSU per year (with CPI
adjustments) till 2002; and
-
all Universities agreed that the
audit process for verifying levels of copying would be via a sampling regime
and not a record-keeping regime.
Mr Groenewegen welcomed the inclusion of digitisation in the
new agreement as it would enable the Library to build up a digital
collection of high use reserve materials (converted from print), assist with
flexible delivery programs and enable simultaneously access to digital
material by many students.
However, Mr Groenewegen noted that the AVCC had warned that
‘open slather copying over the next three years will result in CAL
arguing in the Copyright Tribunal for substantially higher payments in
future years and means that if CAL proposes a future EFTSU rate it will be
considerably higher than the current rate’. The AVCC has suggested that
CAL may suggest amounts as high as $100 to $200 per EFTSU.
During an outline of how a central digitisation facility may
operate the Committee was informed that a centralised facility would assist
in preventing accidental infringement of the Copyright Act, avoid
expenditure on under used faculties and enable accurate record keeping - an
important consideration should Monash want to withdraw from the sampling
regime at the end of 2002 and move to a record keeping process.
Following discussion of the merits of a centralised versus
decentralised system, the Committee endorsed the proposal that digital
copying under the CAL agreement be centralised and that the Library, in
partnership with others, progress the project to the next phase.
4.4.2 Equity Participation in Monash Commercial Entities.
Introducing this item, Ms Crook noted that Council, at its
meeting on 14 August, approved the following (with some minor amendments):
-
Intellectual Property Framework
-
Commercialisation Guidelines
-
University Practice and Paid Outside
Work Policy
Further Deans were advised that policies/guidelines on
Insider Trading, Risk Management and Conflict of Interest were being
developed.
Following discussion of the document, Discussion Draft –
Equity Participation in Monash Commercial Entities, Deans were requested
to forward additional suggestion to Ms Crook
5. Matters raised by Deans
5.1 Proposal to establish advertise and fill a Chair in
Electrical and Computer Systems Engineering in the School of Engineering and
Science, Monash University Malaysia.
The Committee endorsed the proposal to establish, advertise
and fill the Chair in Electrical and Computer Systems Engineering in the
School of Engineering and Science, Monash University Malaysia.
5.2 Budget 2001
Deans were advised that the budget would be submitted to the
Vice-Chancellor’s Group for consideration in the first or second week of
September.
Broad discussion relating to the Budget would continue
throughout September with a draft budget being submitted to the November
meeting of Council.
6. Next meeting
The next meeting of the Deans Discussion Group will be held
at 4.00 pm on Tuesday, 5th September 2000 in the City Office.
The next ordinary meeting of the Committee of Deans will be
held at 2.15 pm on Monday, 9th October 2000 in the Sir George
Lush Room. |