1. There were present:
Professor D A
Robinson, Vice-Chancellor and President, Presiding
Professor P LeP
Darvall, Deputy Vice-Chancellor and Vice-President (Research and
Development)
Ms A Crook,
Deputy Vice-Chancellor and Vice-President (Resources)
Professor J
Anderson, Pro Vice-Chancellor, South Africa Campus
Professor B
Mackenzie, Pro Vice-Chancellor, Gippsland Campus
Professor D
White, Pro Vice-Chancellor, Monash Centre, King’s College London
Professor J
Redmond, Dean, Faculty of Art and Design
Professor H Le
Grand, Dean, Faculty of Arts
Professor G
Palmer, Dean, Faculty of Business and Economics
Professor J
Rosenberg, Dean, Faculty of Information Technology
Professor S
Willis, Dean, Faculty of Education
Professor M
Brisk, Dean, Faculty of Engineering
Professor S
Parker, Dean, Faculty of Law
Professor N
Saunders, Dean, Faculty of Medicine
Professor C
Chapman, Dean, Faculty of Pharmacy
Professor R
Norris, Dean, Faculty of Science
In Attendance were:
Professor Graham
Webb, Director, Centre for Higher Education Quality
Professor M
Evans, Director, Planning and Academic Affairs
Mr P Marshall,
Divisional Director, Student and Staff Services
Apologies:
An apology was received from Professor Alan Lindsay,
Deputy Vice-Chancellor and Vice-President (Academic and Planning)
2. Minutes
The Minutes of Meeting 8/2000 (21 November 2000) of the
Committee of Deans were confirmed subject to the following correction:
Minute 10 Professor Rural Health to read:
" to be funded by the Faculty of Medicine."
There was also comment on Minute 5 Fee Paying
Initiative: Splitting of Combined Degrees. It was advised that there
had been a very positive response to the initiative. The Vice-Chancellor
advised that it would be necessary for participating faculties to be
prepared to answer questions about the arrangements.
3 Matters Arising from the Minutes not dealt with
elsewhere in the Agenda
There were no matters arising.
4. Vice Chancellor’s Group
4.1 Vice-Chancellor and President
4.1.1 Quality
Professor Graham Webb presented a paper, ‘Quality at
Monash’. The paper incorporated quality issues identified by Deans
and set the context for possible developments in anticipation of future
Australian University Quality Agency (AQUA) audit activities. Professor
Webb took members through the paper and indicated that he would be
consulting with each Dean on quality issues during the year.
Discussion focussed on the need to have Monash graduate
attributes carefully defined, the limited applicability of Monquest
evaluation to Performance Evaluation and the desirability of bringing
Monash internal processes to a stage where they would be able to inform
responses to the external audit of quality. The Vice-Chancellor thanked
Professor Webb for his presentation.
4.1.2 London Update
Professor Dick White presented a paper, Monash
University Centre London, Year 2000 Report to Committee of Deans.
Professor White took members through the paper summarising goals,
activities and plans for the Centre. Observations included the need for
a detailed operational plan and the need for continuing raising of
awareness of the Monash presence through joint research, teaching and
student exchanges with King’s College.
The Vice-Chancellor thanked Professor White for his presentation.
4.2 Deputy Vice-Chancellor and Vice-President (Research and
Development)
4.2.1 Update on Gallery
Professor Peter Darvall spoke to this item and reported
that a review working party had been formed and that it was expected
that a report of its findings would be available in March. The terms of
reference of the working party had been defined and information was
currently being collected.
4.3 Deputy Vice-Chancellor and Vice-President (Academic
and Planning)
4.3.1 Guidelines on Academic Promotion
Mr Peter Marshall introduced the paper, Guidelines
for Academic Promotion – 2001 update, noting that changes were not
major between the 2000 and the 2001 guidelines. Comments on the document
included the need for a match between the advertised appointment level
for the position and the skills of the appointee. Promotion processes
should not be used to address anomalies in appointments.
It was pointed out that the use of the term "over a
period of time" on page 25 of the document was not effective and should
be replaced by a more precise phrase. It was agreed that further
comments/input should be forwarded to Mr Marshall.
4.2 Deputy Vice-Chancellor and Vice-President (Resources)
4.4.1 Strategies for a Rewarding Distinguished Academic
Staff
Mr Peter Marshall spoke to the paper, Rewarding
Distinguished Academic Staff noting that the purpose of the paper
was to canvas Dean’s ideas and views as to how the University could
better reward, in particular, its distinguished academic staff. Mr
Marshall explained that the table at Attachment B to the paper displayed
loadings that related to a wide range of situations beyond that of
loadings to Fellows of Academies.
The Vice-Chancellor commented that recognizing and
acknowledging distinguished academic staff should be the focus of
discussion; the financial aspect was a separate issue. There was comment
that the criteria for and number of Sir John Monash Professorial
Appointments were restrictive. Professor Darvall noted that other
Professorships might be created for example, chairs established by the
Alumni. Ms Crook raised the question of recognition of non-professorial
staff.
The Committee resolved to refer the question of
recognition of distinguished academic staff to the Special Professorial
Appointments Sub-Committee of Council for consideration and report back
to the Committee of Deans.
4.4.2 Operation of the University Practice and Paid
Outside Work Policy
Mr Peter Marshall spoke to the distributed papers. These
included:
Ms Crook explained that the papers before the Committee
had been endorsed by the Council subject to the incorporation of further
changes and information. As such these papers established policy within
Monash but that Monash Commercial would provide in due course a separate
set of policies for the staff operating in the commercial arm of the
University’s activities. Focussing on the paper, Additional Academic
Payment Policy, there were concerns expressed about the concept of
establishing minimum and maximum numbers of annual contract hours for
specific academic activities; this was viewed as irrelevant to the
nature of academic endeavour.
5. Matters Raised by Deans
5.1 Proposal for the appointment of a Professor and Head
of the School of Business and Economics, Gippsland
Professor Palmer spoke to this item. The Committee
endorsed the proposal to establish and advertise the position of
Professor and Head of the School of Business and Economics
5.2 Proposal to establish a Second Chair in Econometrics
in the Department of Econometrics and Business Statistics
Professor Palmer spoke to this item. The Committee
endorsed the proposal to establish and advertise a Second Chair in
Econometrics in the Department of Econometrics and Business Statistics.
5.3 Appointment of a Professor and Head of the
Department of Business Law and Taxation
Professor Palmer spoke to this item. Professor Parker
also commented on the proposal. The Committee endorsed the proposal for
transmission to Academic Board and Council subject to Professor Palmer
and Professor Parker proceeding to discussion of the potential for
further collaborative and cooperative activities between the Faculty of
Law and The Department of Business Law and Taxation.
Professor Brisk spoke to this item. The Committee
endorsed the proposal to advertise the position of Chair in Civil
Engineering.
6. Items of Information
Members noted Professor Saunders’ advice that permission
had been granted to establish a medical course in Malaysia and that the
Ministry of Health (Malaysia) had committed a hospital in Johor Bahru as
a Monash teaching hospital. Accreditation by the Australian Medical
Council was under consideration.
Professor John Anderson presented an oral report on
current developments and progress with the South Africa Campus. Members
noted the information and Professor Anderson agreed to meet with
Professor White concerning developing links between the South Africa
Campus and the London Centre.
The next ordinary meeting of the Committee of Deans will
be held at 2:15 pm, Tuesday 20th February 2001, in the Sir
George Lush Room.
The next meeting of the Deans Discussion Group will be
combined with the Committee of Deans, to be held at 4:00pm, Wednesday 14th
March in the City Office.