Committee of Deans Meeting 6-2001
Meeting 6/2001 of the Committee of Deans was held at
2.15 pm on Tuesday, 21 August, 2001 in the Sir George Lush Room, ground
floor, University Offices Building 3a, Clayton campus.
Tony Calder, Secretary
MINUTES
1 There were present
Professor D A
Robinson, Vice-Chancellor and President
Professor A W
Lindsay, Deputy Vice-Chancellor and Vice-President (Academic and
Planning)
Ms A Crook AO,
Deputy Vice-Chancellor and Vice-President (Resources)
Professor B
Mackenzie, Pro Vice-Chancellor, Gippsland
Professor J K
Redmond, Dean, Faculty of Art and Design
Professor H Le
Grand, Dean, Faculty of Arts
Professor G
Palmer, Dean, Faculty of Business and Economics
Professor S
Willis, Dean, Faculty of Education
Professor M L
Brisk, Dean, Faculty of Engineering
Professor J
Rosenberg, Dean, Faculty of Information Technology
Professor S
Parker, Dean, Faculty of Law
Professor N
Saunders, Dean, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences
Professor C B
Chapman, Dean, Faculty of Pharmacy
Associate
Professor Michael Page, Associate Dean, Teaching for Professor Robert
Norris
In Attendance
Professor Merran
Evans, Director, Planning & Academic Affairs
Mr Peter
Marshall, Divisional Director, Student & Staff Services (by
teleconference)
Mr Tony Pollock,
Executive Director, Office of International Affairs
Mr Renn Wortley,
University Solicitor
Ms Amanda Lazar,
Deputy University Solicitor
Apologies
Apologies were received from Professor Peter Darvall,
Deputy Vice-Chancellor & Vice-President (Research & Development) and
Professor Robert Norris, Dean, Faculty of Science.
2 Minutes
The minutes of meeting 4/2001 of the Committee of Deans
were confirmed.
3 Matters arising from the minutes not dealt with elsewhere in the
agenda
4 Vice-Chancellor’s Group
4.1 Vice-Chancellor and President
4.1.1 Guidelines for the Acceptance of Gifts, Benefits and
Hospitality
The Vice-Chancellor introduced this item noting that
there was a need for appropriate guidelines that were not overly
bureaucratic but protected staff and the University from any real or
perceived undue influence and possible criticism.
During discussion, it was agreed that Guideline 1 be
amended to read:
"Staff must exercise judgement in determining whether
the acceptance of any gift, benefit or hospitality could reasonably
be interpreted..."
Two related issues flagged for future consideration
were:
(i) the need for policy relating to gifts/donations for
Faculty Foundations; and
(ii) at what point can gifts/donations be accepted from
students/the family of students – one day, one month or one year after
graduation?
4.2 Deputy Vice-Chancellor and Vice-President (Research and
Development)
4.3 Deputy Vice-Chancellor and Vice-President (Academic
and Planning)
4.3.1 Availability of plagiarised material on web sites
Professor Evans introduced this item noting the
increasing number of web sites selling essays, assignment, exam answers
and notes. Members were advised that it was proposed to establish a
Working Party to review the problem and provide a report to the
Education Committee for consideration.
4.3.2 Minimum Standards for Academic Levels
Mr Picouleau reported on recent discussions with the
NTEU and noted that areas of disagreement were still the subject of
discussions with both the NTEU and the AHEIA.
Matters raised during discussion included:
-
reference to allowances for course
coordinator role may be problematic given the number of subjects
shared across courses and the variation in the size of courses;
-
the need to maintain the integrity of
the merit based promotions system;
-
the appointment process for Associate
Professors; and
-
the need to include leadership in the
descriptors for Level D.
In concluding the discussion, it was noted that the
document detailed "minimum standards" and that further detail on outputs
should be included in Engagement Profiles.
4.3.3 Performance Management Scheme and the Evaluation
of Teaching
Members noted the need for appropriate evaluation of
teaching for the purpose of performance management.
Following discussion of the three options
(i) make MonQueST results obligatory for performance
management;
(ii) make subject evaluation results obligatory for
performance management; and
(iii) review present policy and processes concerning
teaching evaluation
and related issues, it was agreed that Option (iii) be
adopted and progressed by a Working party as proposed in the
documentation.
4.3.4 Course Structures for Professional and Employment
Needs
Professor Lindsay introduced this item noting that
during discussion of this matter at meeting 3/2001 of Academic Board, it
was clear that the issues raised in relation to the postgraduate course
level were closely intertwined and required more strategic and
co-ordinated consideration.
Noting the importance of postgraduate course structures,
it was proposed to further elaborate the issues involved and identify
directions for further development of postgraduate awards.
Accordingly, three key clusters of issues were detailed
in Attachment 6.
The Vice-Chancellor requested the views of the Deans and
the following observations were made:
-
noting that most undergraduate degrees
contain a research element, it might be appropriate to look at
establishing a Master of Philosophy;
-
the need to facilitate the fluid
movement of students between coursework and research streams; and
-
offering double Masters programs should
be investigated.
Concluding the discussion, Professor Lindsay thanked
Deans for their contribution and advised that the Working Party proposed
in the document would be established as soon as practicable.
4.3.5 Transfer to Faculty Boards of authority to make
regulations prescribing awards
Mr Renn Wortley, University Solicitor spoke to this
item.
Mr Wortley advised members that once all faculties had
made and promulgated their award regulations, Council would be asked to
make a statute repealing sections 1 and 2 of Statute 6.1.2. – Courses
and Degrees, and the devolution to faculty boards of authority to make
regulations prescribing their awards would be complete.
4.4 Deputy Vice-Chancellor and Vice-President
(Resources)
4.4.1 Space Management Project
Ms Crook introduced this item noting that a database of
users of space and the condition of each area was being developed.
Further, members were advised that the "Space Ownership Framework" would
be a topic for discussion at the next meeting of the Deans Discussion
Group.
Ms Crook requested that Deans give further consideration
to the projected growth in student numbers as these would inform the
Capital Development Plan.
5 Matters raised by Deans
5.1 Potential impact on international students of the
new visa regulations
Mr Tony Pollock, Executive Director, Office of
International Affairs spoke to this item.
Mr Pollock provided members with a package of documents
including the following:
-
National Code of Practice for
Registration Authorities and Providers of Education and Training to
Overseas Students;
-
a summary of changes to the Migration
Act and the restructuring of student visa criterion, and
-
copies of overheads used at student and
staff briefing sessions.
Describing the ESOS Act changes as prescriptive and
based on "good practice", Mr Pollock noted that many issues/concerns had
been raised. These included the need to ensure the appropriateness of
all documentation for prospective students so that the University did
not incur penalties and the role of "Associates" of overseas
representatives and referral agents.
Further issues raised during discussion included:
-
the definition of a full time student
and the prohibition on students repeating subjects;
-
the requirement that students moving
from foundation to undergraduate programs return home before
commencing their new course;
-
the increased number of student visa
categories based on risk;
-
the increased reporting requirement
placed on institutions; and
-
the difficulty in getting advice and/or
interpretations from government departments.
In concluding the discussion, the Vice-Chancellor noted
that Mr Pollock and his colleagues were visiting all campuses and
running a series of forums for staff and students.
Members were requested to forward any further issues to
Mr Pollock who would attempt to resolve, provide appropriate advice or
give guidance where requested.
5.2 Proposal for Promotion to Professor
Professor John Rosenberg, Dean, Faculty of Information
Technology introduced this item.
Professor Rosenberg informed members that four Associate
Professors had requested that he raise the issue of promotion to
professor. Noting that Monash currently had no formal process for
promotion to professor, Professor Rosenberg informed members that the
demand for good senior staff in the area of information technology was
growing steadily and could result in the loss of valuable staff.
Further, Professor Rosenberg suggested that it might be an appropriate
time to have a further discussion on pathways leading to promotion to
professor.
Professor Lindsay advised members that the Special
Professorial Appointments Committee had previously looked at the issue
of pathways but could consider this matter and the related issue of the
appointment process for Associate Professor.
In concluding discussion on the matter, the
Vice-Chancellor advised that the matter could be considered alongside
the other tasks undertaken by the Special Professorial Appointments
Committee and brought back to the Committee of Deans for further
consideration.
5.3 Proposal to establish and fill a Chair of Applied
Sciences
The Committee endorsed the proposal to establish and
fill a Chair of Applied Sciences.
5.4 Proposal to establish and fill the Louis Waller
Chair of Law
The Committee endorsed the proposal to establish and
fill the Louis Waller Chair of Law.
5.5 Proposal of the Faculty of Art and Design to
establish a Department of Multimedia and Digital Arts and to merge the
existing Departments of Fine Art and Applied Arts into the Department of
Fine Arts.
The Committee endorsed the proposal to establish a
Department of Multimedia and Digital Arts and to merge the existing
Departments of Fine Art and Applied Arts into the Department of Fine
Arts.
6 Other business
Professor Redmond, Dean, Faculty of Art and Design,
informed members of the opening of the Fred Williams: Landscapes 1959
- 1981 exhibition at the Faculty of Art and Design Gallery and the
recent donation of artwork to the gallery by Rio Tinto.
Professor Parker, Dean, Faculty of Law, provided members
with an update on the status of the Institutional Self Review and
informed members that Monash would not be subject to an AQUA audit in
2002.
7 Items for information
8 Next meeting
The next meeting of the Deans Discussion Group will be
held at 4.00pm on Tuesday 4th September 2001 in the City
Office.
The next ordinary meeting of the Committee of Deans will
be held at 2.15pm on Tuesday 16th October 2001 in the Sir
George Lush Room.
Distribution
Vice-Chancellor
and President
Deputy
Vice-Chancellors and Vice-Presidents
Pro
Vice-Chancellors
Deans
|