Committee of Deans Meeting 2-2004
Meeting 2/2004 of the Committee of Deans was held at
4.00 pm on Tuesday, 23 March 2004 in the Monash City Office, Level 11,
30 Collins Street, Melbourne.
MINUTES
1 Attendance and apologies
There were present:
Professor R
Larkins AO, Vice-Chancellor
Professor S
Parker, Deputy Vice-Chancellor
Professor A
Lindsay, Deputy Vice-Chancellor (Academic)
Ms A Crook AO,
Deputy Vice-Chancellor (Resources)
Professor E
Cornish, Deputy Vice-Chancellor (Research)
Professor B
Mackenzie, Pro Vice-Chancellor, Gippsland Campus
Professor J K
Redmond, Dean, Faculty of Art and Design
Professor H Le
Grand, Dean, Faculty of Arts
Professor G
Palmer, Dean, Faculty of Business and Economics
Professor S
Willis, Dean, Faculty of Education
Professor T
Sridhar, Dean, Faculty of Engineering
Professor R
Weber, Dean, Faculty of Information Technology
Professor A
Freiberg, Dean, Faculty of Law
Professor L
Piterman, Acting Dean, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences
Professor R
Norris, Dean, Faculty of Science
Professor M
King, Director, Research Graduate School
Apologies:
Professor M
Liddell, Pro Vice-Chancellor, Malaysia Campus
Professor J
Anderson, Pro Vice-Chancellor, South Africa
Professor E
Byrne, Dean, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences
Professor C
Chapman, Dean, Faculty of Pharmacy
Secretary:
Mr T Calder, Director, Executive Services
2 Minutes
The Minutes of meeting 1/2004 of the Committee of Deans
held on 10 February 2004 were approved.
3 Matters arising from the Minutes (not dealt with
elsewhere in the Agenda)
4 Response to the Higher Education Support Act 2003 (HESA)
Introducing the item, Professor Larkins outlined to
members the events surrounding the recent student protests that resulted
in the relocation of the Council meeting and damage to several
administrative buildings.
Referring to the decision of Council, as detailed in the
paper ‘Report to Council: Recommended Response to the Higher
Education Support Act (HESA) – 2003’, Professor Larkins noted that
the recommendations approved by Council were open-ended insofar as the
detail of the courses with lower fee levels and detailed equity measures
were still being considered. Members were advised that these aspects
would be progressed over the coming months.
Members discussed a range of issues including Monash’s
existing range of access and equity programs, the need to grow research
activity and improve research infrastructure, enrolment patterns of
students from low socio-economic backgrounds compared to students from
higher socio-economic environments, the financial implications of the
increased revenue streams and the rationale for implementing the change
immediately rather than waiting until after the next federal election.
Following the discussion, members indicated that they
concurred with the recommendations approved by Council and looked
forward to the development of the detail relating to the new
initiatives.
5 ‘Access Monash’
Professor Lindsay introduced the document ‘Access
Monash Discussion Paper’ noting that the Pricing, Positioning and
Equity Working Party (PPE) would finalise guidelines that would assist
faculties develop initiatives which, when developed, would be considered
by Education Committee and the PPE.
Outlining the proposed scope of the Access Monash
program, members were informed that it was planned to offer a wide-range
of courses with one suggestion being that 5% of places in participating
courses be made available under this initiative. It was noted that each
faculty would develop the structure of each program.
Other aspects of the program discussed included the
possible role of Monash College, the need to develop an appropriate
methodology to identify an initial target group for entry/admission, the
ongoing need to supply learning support services to students and the
current situation relating to exemption scholarships and living
allowances.
During discussion of the paper, members provided a range
of comments/suggestions including:
-
one objective of the
program was to give deserving students that would not normally gain
access to Monash’s programs via existing pathways an opportunity to
access high prestige courses;
-
careful consideration
needed to be given to any methodology adopted to identify
disadvantaged schools and/or regions;
-
Access Monash
could be seen as the umbrella program with other initiatives fitting
beneath it;
-
a query was raised as to
whether the proposal widened access versus deepening access and care
needed to be taken so that existing programs were not compromised;
-
it was suggested that the
new initiative must be structured so that it could be easily and
simply communicated to all stakeholders eg take the top 2-3 students
from selected schools;
-
members discussed the
appropriateness of methodologies to identify "disadvantaged schools"
and "disadvantaged students";
-
the setting of fee levels
for research honours programs still required further consideration;
-
the need to give careful
consideration to the enhancement/development of indigenous programs
particularly at the University level.; and
-
the mechanism for funding
and then recouping costs (less administrative costs) for scholarships
would need to be reviewed.
Professor Larkins thanked members for their
contributions.
6 Report on Profile discussions
Commenting on the outcome of recent profile discussions
with officers from DEST, Professor Larkins informed members that for
courses where there were no HECS loads, it appeared that there was no
limit to the number of fee-paying students that could be enrolled.
7 Other business
7.1 Service Level Agreements (SLAs)
A member requested clarification on whether Deans
separately or collectively signed off on SLAs for services provided
across faculties.
Members were advised that the matter was with Faculty
Managers, however, if a procedural issue required discussion then the
matter could be referred to Ms Crook or subsequently, to a meeting of
the Senior Management Committee.
7.2 Associates Program – Arts Centre
Ms Crook informed members that Monash had subscribed for a group
membership including a range of services that could be utilised for
corporate functions.
Further details would be provided to Deans by the Office
of the Deputy Vice-Chancellor (Resources) and, if appropriate, a future
meeting of the Committee of Deans may be scheduled at the venue.
8 Next meeting
The next meeting of the Committee of Deans will be held
at 4.00 pm on Tuesday, 11 May 2004 in the City Office.
Distribution
Vice-Chancellor
Deputy
Vice-Chancellor
Deputy
Vice-Chancellor (Academic)
Deputy
Vice-Chancellor (Research)
Deputy
Vice-Chancellor (Resources)
Pro
Vice-Chancellors
Deans
Director,
Research Graduate School
|