Meeting No. 3/2001 of the Education Committee was held on Wednesday, 9 May 2001 in the Sir George Lush Room, Administration Building 3A, Clayton Campus, between 2:15pm and 4:15pm.

Ms K Wilson-Reid

Executive Officer

There were present: Professor A Lindsay (Chair), Dr M Peel, Mr K Bensley, Associate Professor A Farley, Associate Professor I Prince, Professor W Young, Associate Professor J Hurst, Mr C Avram, Professor S Campbell, Associate Professors T Luff, M Sim and M Page, Dr T Patti, Associate Professor L Roller, Professors M King, J Harris and G Webb, Mr S Szewach, Mr C Wolfe, Ms D Brown and Ms M Mahat.

In attendance were: Mr C Vernon, Mr P Lawford, Mr P Yates (alternate for Mr P Marshall), Ms K Wilson-Reid, Dr K Macrae, Associate Professor M Eley, Dr P Jamieson, Ms S Stafford, Ms N Mitchell, Ms D de Zilwa and Ms M Pernat.

The Chair, Professor A Lindsay, welcomed to the meeting new members Mr S Szewach (MONSU - Caulfield), Mr C Wolfe (MONSU – Peninsula) and Ms M Mahat (MPA - masters), and those in attendance for this meeting, Dr K Macrae, Associate Professor M Eley, Dr P Jamieson, Ms S Stafford, Ms N Mitchell, Ms D de Zilwa and Ms M Pernat.

Apologies for this meeting were received from Professor M Evans, Associate Professor L Nethercott, Dr I Walker and Mr S Juster.

The Committee noted that certain items had been starred as requiring discussion. Item 14.1 was also starred at the meeting.

The Committee endorsed the recommendations for all items other than those starred.

The Committee approved the Minutes of Meeting 2/2001, held 21 March 2001, that had been circulated separately.

The Academic Board, at its Meeting 2/2001, approved all matters that were forwarded by the Education Committee from its Meeting 2/2001.

The Committee noted that the Academic Board had endorsed and submitted to the University Council, legislation that would revise Statute 6.2 – Exclusion for Unsatisfactory Progress and the Exclusion for Unsatisfactory Progress Regulations. (Appropriate approval of the legislation would enable implementation of the recommendations contained in the Report of the Working Party on the Review of Exclusion for Unsatisfactory Progress, approved at Academic Board Meeting 2/2000.) Professor Lindsay advised that it was anticipated that Council would consider the revised legislation at its meeting on 25 June.

Members noted the web page below for the new course development software and the Integrated Academic and Resource Planning Approach. The proforma for faculties to report bi-annually to the Education Committee about their approved course and subject developments, for noting, was also located at this site.

http://www.adm.monash.edu.au/unisec/res/cds/index.html

The Deputy Vice-Chancellor (Academic and Planning), Professor A Lindsay, informed members that the central support group had met again recently and that ‘CDS Help’ would shortly be set up on the website for assistance to course developers. Associate Deans Teaching agreed to email the office of the DVC with details of course planning exercises.

A member queried whether there was a continued need to complete the Library Impact Statement at the course level when such information requirements had been met at the subject level. It was noted that this matter would be raised with the central support group.

The Learning and Teaching Plan – Performance Report 2000, presented by the offices of the Deputy Vice-Chancellor (Academic and Planning), and Planning and Academic Affairs, was circulated (p 1-14).

The Education Committee received and noted the Learning and Teaching Plan – Performance Report 2000.

The Committee noted an extract that was circulated from the minutes of Council Meeting 2/2001, held 19 March 2001 (p 15-16). The extract related to a report presented to the Council by the Deputy Vice-Chancellor (Academic and Planning), entitled ‘Development of the Curriculum: Engagement with Stakeholders’. This report was the first of a series of overviews of the university’s course portfolio.

Professor Lindsay thanked Associate Deans Teaching for their assistance in progressing the report through the Academic Board to Council. The Chair advised members regarding Council’s consideration of the report. It was noted that Council had raised certain matters as requiring further attention, as detailed in the minute presented, such as:

It was noted that Council had requested that a further report be provided on faculty progress in strengthening engagement, where appropriate, with the support of university guidelines. Associate Deans Teaching agreed to look back at the paper entitled ‘Development of the Curriculum: Engagement with Stakeholders’ (working with the Associate Dean External where appropriate), taking into consideration the points raised by Council and also looking at the ticks and comparisons in relation to their faculty. The paper is located at:

http://www.adm.monash.edu.au/unisec/com/cn/cni/repcur.html

Members noted that an interim item about engagement with stakeholders would be included on the agenda for CADeT Meeting 4/2001 (submissions due by 20 August). A full item including all faculty feedback would then be included on the agenda for Education Committee Meeting 5/2001 (submissions due 12 September). Professor Lindsay advised that it was anticipated that the further report on engagement with stakeholders would be provided to Council late in the year.

A draft paper entitled ‘Course structures for employment and professional needs’, presented by the Deputy Vice-Chancellor (Academic and Planning), Professor A Lindsay, was distributed to members via email prior to the meeting.

This paper was the second of a series of three overviews of the university’s course portfolio, as foreshadowed in a paper from the Deputy Vice-Chancellor (Academic and Planning), The Relationship between Academic Board and Council, that was presented to Council 4/2000. It was anticipated that this second overview paper would be considered at Meeting 3/2001 of the Academic Board, to be held on 6 June.

Professor A Lindsay spoke to this item and briefly took members through each section of the paper. The following matters were discussed by the Committee:

Education Committee:

A proposed Training and Support of Sessional Teaching Appointees Policy, and accompanying Guidelines, were circulated (p 17-22). Dr K Macrae, Acting Faculty Manager and Associate Dean (External Affairs), Faculty of Science, and Associate Professor M Eley, Higher Education Development Unit, CeLTS, were in attendance.

Drafts of this policy were considered at Meetings 3/2000 and 6/2000 of the Committee of Associate Deans (Teaching). The proposal, amended by Dr K Macrae and Associate Professors M Eley and A Farley, taking into account feedback that was received from faculties and other units, was attached to the CADeT Minutes 6/2000 for further comments and it was subsequently adapted to conform with the format of the proforma for policy and procedures adopted at Education Committee Meeting 5/2000.

Dr Macrae noted the wide variation in the categories of sessional teaching staff, ranging from honours students to experienced senior management, and highlighted the need for a set of central principles to allow for adequate preparation and support that would recognise different needs and equip sessional appointees with skills specific to their needs. The Committee noted that CeLTS and HEDU would provide support for faculties / departments / schools to implement these principles.

Discussion occurred regarding various aspects of the policy and guidelines, including:

The Education Committee considered and endorsed the proposed Policy on the Training and Support of Sessional Teaching Appointees, and the accompanying Guidelines, and referred the proposed policy to the Student and Staff Services Division, and the Committee of Deans, for further consideration.

(Secretarial Note: Minor amendments to the document were made by the Executive Officer taking into account the points raised by the Committee. Following the receipt of comments from the Student and Staff Services Division, any significant amendments would be incorporated by the policy authors and the draft policy and guidelines would be forwarded to the Committee of Deans for consideration.)

A Report on the Graduate Certificate in Higher Education (GCHE), prepared by Dr P Jamieson, Course Coordinator, GCHE, was circulated (p 23-26). Associate Professor M Eley and Dr P Jamieson, Higher Education Development Unit, CeLTS, were in attendance.

Dr Jamieson introduced this item and highlighted aspects of the report. During the introduction and discussion, matters were raised including:

Education Committee received and noted the report on the GCHE, and noted that particular matters would be progressed by Dr Jamieson, including:

A document was circulated in the agenda, presented by Professor G Webb, Director, Centre for Higher Education Quality (CHEQ), titled Guidelines for Academic Review (exposure draft) (p 27-44). A further document, titled Quality at Monash, was distributed to the Committee via email prior to the meeting.

Professor Webb introduced this item and commented on the major features of the two papers, noting also that the papers had previously been considered by the Vice-Chancellor’s Group. Professor Webb highlighted important aspects of the quality paper including fitness for purpose, a systematic (yet not prescriptive) approach and the importance of feedback.

The Committee noted the documents presented titled Guidelines for Academic Review (exposure draft) and Quality at Monash and brief feedback about the drafts was provided. Members agreed to forward further comments about how best to achieve and strengthen Monash’s quality aims to Professor Webb following the meeting. The Chair added that, if it was thought appropriate by the Deputy Vice-Chancellor (Research), these draft papers should proceed to the PhD and Scholarships Committee for comment. It was noted that the draft papers would be submitted to the Committee of Deans and the Academic Board.

A paper titled ‘Recommendations for Enhancement to Academic Transcripts’ (dated 23 April 2001), presented by Mr P Yates, Director of Services and Systems, Student and Staff Services, was circulated (p 45-48). Preparation of this document had been done in consultation with Professor M Evans, Director of Planning and Academic Affairs.

Mr Yates introduced this item highlighting that many institutions use academic transcripts partly to emphasise the positive aspects of student results. Some of the recommendations under this item were in keeping with this approach. The Committee considered the recommendations presented taking into consideration further information that was provided by Mr Yates and issues that were raised during discussion.

The Education Committee gave in principle endorsement to the following recommendations from the paper presented:

8 That discontinuations be recorded as WD. (It was noted that discontinued subjects would appear on transcripts in accordance with the Committee’s decision at Meeting 7/2000.)

The Committee agreed not to endorse recommendations 1 and 2 from the paper presented regarding omission of the record of exclusion for unsatisfactory progress or misconduct. Some members held the view that transcripts should clearly distinguish different aspects of students’ history at the university including outcomes in relation to exclusion. It was felt that this would provide more meaningful information for prospective employers and others concerned, in addition to adequately reflecting the importance of the university’s formal decision making processes.

The Education Committee supported Mr Yates’ suggestion that certain matters be explored in greater depth and resolved that further consideration should be given to the recommendations set out below:

6 That ‘prizes specific to faculty or industry’ be considered for inclusion on academic transcripts;

A student member foreshadowed additional matters for consideration within this context including the possibility of removal of results from a transcript where adequate reasons could be demonstrated and a related matter that would be relayed to Mr Yates following the meeting. The Chair noted that equity and other issues would need to be given fuller attention in relation to this suggestion.

It was agreed that Mr Yates would coordinate further consideration of the unresolved recommendations and additional suggestions above by bringing together a small group to discuss relevant matters and prepare these issues for inclusion in the agenda for the next meeting.

A memorandum from Mr P Yates, Director of Services and Systems, dated 13 February 2001, was circulated (p 49-50).

In early 2000, the Committee of Associate Deans (Teaching) (CADeT) endorsed a principle, that was proposed by the IAS Project (Callista), that the University’s use of terminology in relation to subjects be changed to "subject/unit", with the intention that the University would in future adopt the single term "unit". Following this period during which the University has had an opportunity to adapt to the changed terminology, it was proposed that the University formally adopt use of the term "unit" to replace the term "subject".

Education Committee endorsed the proposal presented that the University formally adopt the use of the term "unit" in replacement of the traditionally used term "subject", noting that this terminology would be used in all publications from 1 January 2002.

(Secretarial Note: Subsequent to the meeting, this matter was formally approved by the Deputy Vice-Chancellor (Academic and Planning), and relevant areas of the University were notified.)

A document was circulated (p 51-54).

Education Committee received and noted the Report of Meeting 1/2001 of the Board of the Faculty of Arts, held 18 April 2001, and considered each item requiring action separately for submission to the Academic Board.

Handbook entries were circulated for the new subjects proposed for establishment under this item (p 55-64).

This item was starred at the meeting. Dr M Peel, Acting Associate Dean Teaching, Faculty of Arts, provided clarification regarding issues that were raised in relation to the subject proposals at agenda pages 55–57. It was agreed that Dr Peel would arrange for certain changes to be made to the relevant handbook entries and that the revised documentation would be checked by two ADTs and signed off by the Chair prior to the proposals being submitted to Academic Board.

Subject to the amendments agreed above, Education Committee endorsed for submission to Academic Board the proposal of the Board of the Faculty of Arts to establish the twenty-six (26) subjects listed below, noting that of those subjects nine (9) were new subjects for establishment, twelve (12) were new subjects by virtue of a change to credit points, and five (5) were new subjects by virtue of an additional year level of offering:

(Secretarial Note: Appropriate amendment to/sign off on the relevant handbook entries occurred subsequent to the meeting.)

A document was circulated (p 65-68).

Education Committee noted the decision of the Board of the Faculty of Arts to make amendments to subjects as detailed under items 1.5 and 2.1 of the Faculty Board Report and the documentation presented.

Education Committee noted the disestablishment of the following subjects by the Board of the Faculty of Arts:

14.4 Cessation of Intake into Subjects

Education Committee endorsed the proposal of the Board of the Faculty of Arts to cease intake into the following subjects:

At Meeting 2/2001 of Education Committee, it was noted that the previous meeting of the Board of the Faculty of Arts was inquorate and that all matters forwarded under that report were to be submitted to the next meeting of the Faculty Board, to be held 18 April 2001, for ratification.

Education Committee members noted that the Board of the Faculty of Arts had ratified those matters as previously forwarded.

Education Committee noted that the matters listed below, which were approved subject to ratification by the Board of the Faculty of Arts, were ratified by the Board at its Meeting 1/2001, held 18 April 2001:

It was noted that the report that was forwarded under this item (reports from all faculties were requested in the agenda for Education Committee 7/2000) would be presented to the Education Committee when all faculty reports on this matter had been received.

Education Committee noted the decision of the Board of the Faculty of Arts to disestablish the following course codes for courses in that Faculty:

A document was circulated (p 69-72).

Education Committee received the Report of Meeting 2/2001 of the Board of the Faculty of Business and Economics, held 18 April 2001, noted the Proceedings and considered each item requiring action separately for submission to the Academic Board.

Documentation was circulated (p 73-80). (The proposal also included two new subjects, MGC5810&5820, proposed under the item "New Subjects" below.)

The course proposed for establishment under this item had cross-faculty involvement with the Faculty of Information Technology. The Committee was advised that consultation had occurred with that Faculty.

The Master of Business Management would be included in the University’s Schedule of Exceptions in the Graduate Studies Policy. The admission requirements for the masters degree (72 points) were as follows: "Applicants must hold either an undergraduate degree or an executive certificate at a credit level average from the Faculty of Business and Economics."

The Committee noted that, whilst approval was sought in this proposal for establishment of the Masters program for off campus delivery to Australian students, the course had been designed to provide a possible vehicle for use in future programs outside Australia. The Deputy Vice-Chancellor (Academic and Planning) advised that if there was a further proposal to take the course outside Australia, approval would be sought to do so by the Faculty at that time (refer also to item 20.1). Professor Lindsay highlighted that faculties would need to give careful consideration to offshore quality assurance requirements as proposals came forward.

The Education Committee endorsed for submission to Academic Board the proposal of the Board of the Faculty of Business and Economics to establish the Master of Business Management, to be offered off campus (within Australia), from the Gippsland campus commencing semester two, 2001.

Documentation was circulated (p 81-82).

Education Committee endorsed for submission to Academic Board the proposal of the Board of the Faculty of Business and Economics to extend the Master of Business Law, to allow for the course to also be offered off campus, effective from semester two, 2001.

Documentation was circulated (p 83-94).

The Education Committee endorsed for submission to Academic Board the proposal of the Board of the Faculty of Business and Economics to amend the title of the Master of Management (International Business), to become the Master of International Business.

Documentation was circulated (p 85-86).

The Education Committee endorsed for submission to Academic Board the proposal of the Board of the Faculty of Business and Economics to amend the Graduate Diploma in Human Resources, to reduce the number of core subjects from seven to five and increase the number of electives to three subjects.

Documentation was circulated (p 87-88).

The Education Committee endorsed for submission to Academic Board the proposal of the Board of the Faculty of Business and Economics to amend the Graduate Diploma in Business Management, to reduce the number of core subjects from five to four and increase the number of electives to four subjects.

A document was circulated (p 89-90).

The Education Committee endorsed for submission to Academic Board the proposal of the Board of the Faculty of Business and Economics to amend the Postgraduate Diploma in Health Economics and Evaluation, to replace core subject ECC4999 Evaluation Methods and Epidemiology, with MPH1041 Introductory Epidemiology (subjects taught by the University of Melbourne).

Education Committee noted the decision of the Board of the Faculty of Business and Economics to amend the courses listed below as detailed under item 6 of the Faculty Board Report presented:

Permit students to choose up to two level 9 or up to four level 4 subjects, or up to four level 5 subjects offered by the Department of Business Law and Taxation.

Offer an increased range of elective subjects in particular in the information technology and business related area.

Increase the choice of elective subjects and replace MDF5301 Thesis/Project, with MKF5150 Major Project.

Handbook entries were circulated (p 91-94).

Education Committee endorsed for submission to Academic Board the proposal of the Board of the Faculty of Business and Economics to establish the four (4) subjects listed below:

Education Committee noted the decision of the Board of the Faculty of Business and Economics to make amendments to subjects as detailed under items 7 and 8 of the Faculty Board Report presented.

A document was circulated (p 95-96).

Education Committee received the Report of Meeting 1/2001 of the Board of the Faculty of Education, held 14 March 2001, noted the Proceedings and considered the item requiring action for submission to Academic Board.

16.1. Major Amendment to Existing Course - Postgraduate Diploma of Education – Tagged Pathway

Documentation was circulated (p 97-100).

Education Committee endorsed for submission to Academic Board the proposal of the Board of the Faculty of Education to amend the Postgraduate Diploma of Education, to offer the tagged award Postgraduate Diploma of Education (Special Education), on campus at the Clayton, Gippsland and Peninsula campuses, commencing semester two, 2001.

Education Committee noted the decision of the Board of the Faculty of Education to amend the first year of the Bachelor of Early Childhood Education, to allow EDF1514 Visual Arts in Early Childhood to be moved from semester one to semester two, and EDF1513 Music in Early Childhood to be moved from semester two to semester one, effective from semester one, 2001.

Education Committee noted the decision of the Board of the Faculty of Education to make amendments to subjects as detailed under item 2 of the Proceedings in the Faculty Board Report presented.

A document was circulated (p 101-102).

Education Committee received the Report of Meeting 2/2001 of the Board of the Faculty of Engineering, held 4 April 2001, and considered the item for submission to Academic Board.

The handbook entry was circulated (p 103-104).

Education Committee endorsed for submission to Academic Board the proposal of the Board of the Faculty of Engineering to establish the subject CHE4153 Chemical Engineering Troubleshooting.

The Board of the Faculty of Engineering approved the following motion submitted by the Engineering Education Committee:

Education Committee noted the decision of the Board of the Faculty of Engineering to devolve approval of subjects/units and amendments to subjects/units as outlined above.

A document was circulated (p 105-106).

Education Committee received the Report of Meeting 2/2001 of the Board of the Faculty of Information Technology, held 18 April 2001, and considered the matters requiring action for submission to the Academic Board.

Education Committee noted the decision of the Board of the Faculty of Information Technology to amend the courses listed below, as detailed under item 1 of the Faculty Board Report presented:

Amend the structure of the Information Systems Development specialisation of the Master of Information Management and Systems, to permit:

Amend the course structure to:

Handbook entries were circulated (p 107-110).

Education Committee endorsed for submission to Academic Board the proposal of the Board of the Faculty of Information Technology to establish the two (2) subjects listed below:

Education Committee noted the decision of the Board of the Faculty of Information Technology to make amendments to subjects as detailed under item 3 of the Faculty Board Report presented.

A document was circulated (p 111-114).

Education Committee received the Report of Meeting 1/2001 of the Board of the Faculty of Law, held 11 April 2001, noted the Proceedings and considered each item requiring action separately for submission to the Academic Board.

Documentation was circulated (p 115-122).

The existing Master of Laws (Legal Practice), was approved at Academic Board Meeting 5/2000 as a 192 credit point masters degree to be undertaken by non-law graduates. This masters provided a single course that would allow admission as a legal practitioner. The Faculty of Law also offers the Post Graduate Diploma in Legal Practice, Skills and Ethics, a 48 credit point award in practical legal training that leads to admission as a legal practitioner in Victoria, following completion of an LLB.

This amendment expanded the LLM (Legal Practice), now to be called the LLM (Legal Practice, Skills and Ethics), to also permit students who had completed an LLB to undertake the course. Students who held an LLB and had successfully completed the Postgraduate Diploma in Legal Practice, Skills and Ethics (see proposal for specifics), would complete a 72 credit point version of the LLM (LPSE), including 48 points credit granted for the Postgraduate Diploma.

Members are noted the initiatives currently being considered by the Faculty of Law in relation to forming a consortium of the Law Schools of Monash, Griffith and the ANU to develop a national course based on the existing post graduate diplomas of legal practice courses, which could be provided on-line direct into law firms. (It was anticipated that students who completed the national post graduate diploma course would be able to proceed to an LLM at one of the consortium universities.)

Education Committee endorsed for submission to Academic Board the proposal of the Board of the Faculty of Law to amend the Master of Laws (Legal Practice), as detailed in the documentation attached, to:

The amendment under this item has cross-faculty involvement with the Faculty of Arts. The Faculty of Law advised that the amendment had also been approved by the Board of the Faculty of Arts.

Education Committee noted the decision of the Board of the Faculty of Law to amend the Bachelor of Performing Arts / Bachelor of Laws, as detailed under item 2.1 of the Faculty Board Report presented, due to the standardisation of Arts subjects to 6 or 12 credit points, to decrease the total number of credit points for the combined Bachelor of Performing Arts / Bachelor of Laws by four points from 256 to 252. (As a consequence, the previous two alternative structures have been combined and the decrease would occur in subjects offered by the Centre of Drama and Theatre Studies in the third year. There was no change to the structure of the Bachelor of Laws.)

Education Committee noted that the Board of the Faculty of Law had ratified matters that were previously (conditionally) approved as detailed under Proceedings (Section B) of the Faculty Board Report presented.

A document was circulated (p 123-124).

Education Committee received the Report of Meeting 2/2001 of the Board of the Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, held 28 March 2001, and considered each item requiring action separately for submission to the Academic Board.

Documentation was circulated (p 125-134). (This proposal also involved the proposals for four new "MEU…." subjects as proposed under the "New Subjects" item below.)

Members noted that the course proposed for establishment under this item had cross-faculty involvement with the Faculty of Education. The relevant cross-faculty consultation had occurred.

The Graduate Certificate in Medical Education would be delivered off-campus within Australia. The Committee noted that the course may in future be delivered to students overseas. Professor Lindsay advised that if the offshore offering were to proceed, a separate proposal to extend the course (taking into account all relevant offshore quality assurance requirements) would be prepared by the Faculty for consideration at that time (refer also to item 15.1).

Education Committee endorsed for submission to Academic Board the proposal of the Board of the Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences to establish a Graduate Certificate in Medical Education, to be offered off campus (via distance education within Australia) from the Clayton campus, commencing semester one, 2002.

Handbook entries were circulated (p 135-144).

Education Committee endorsed for submission to Academic Board the proposal of the Board of the Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences to establish the five (5) subjects listed below:

The next scheduled meeting of the Education Committee (Meeting 4/2001) will be held at 2:15 pm on Wednesday, 1 August 2001.

All submissions for the agenda for that meeting are due by 5pm, Wednesday, 18 July 2001. For further information about the Education Committee including meeting dates and the submission schedule, please refer to the University Secretariat website at the following address:

http://www.adm.monash.edu.au/unisec/com/ec/information.html

Professor Alan Lindsay (Chair)

Dr Mark Peel (Acting)

Associate Professor David Garrioch (OSP 1/2001)

Dr Denise Cuthbert

Mr Karen Bensley

Professor Alan Farley

Associate Professor Les Nethercott (ADGS to Meeting 3/01)

Professor Sally Joy (ADGS from Meeting 4/01)

Dr Debbie Gorrigan

Dr Paul Richardson

Associate Professor Ian Prince

Professor William Young

Associate Professor John Hurst

Mr Chris Avram

Professor Susan Campbell

Associate Professor Tony Luff

Associate Professor Malcolm Sim

Associate Professor Michael Page

Dr Tony Patti

Associate Professor Louis Roller

Professor Peter Stewart

Professor Max King

Professor Merran Evans

Professor John Harris

Professor Graham Webb

Mr Simon Szewach (MONSU – Caulfield)

Mr Colin Wolfe (MONSU – Peninsula)

Mr Eyal Miller (MUBS)

Ms Deb Brown (MSA)

Mr Sharn Juster (MUGSU)

Ms Marian Mahat (MPA – masters)

Mr Clive Vernon

Mr Peter Lawford

Mr Peter Marshall (alternate Mr Peter Yates)

Ms Kerri Wilson-Reid (Executive Officer)

Faculty Registrars/Managers (*9)

Mr P Siggins

Mr D Mernagh

Ms C Holland

Ms P Herman

Mr B Eddy

Ms M Fairbanks

Dr A Mitchell

Ms S Stafford