Monash UniversityEducation Committee Meeting 4-2001Meeting No. 4/2001 of the Education Committee was held on Wednesday, 1 August 2001 in the Sir George Lush Room, Administration Building 3A, Clayton Campus, between 2:15pm and 3:20pm. Ms K Wilson-Reid Executive Officer There were present: Professor A Lindsay (Chair), Associate Professor D Garrioch, Mr K Bensley, Professors A Farley and S Joy, Dr D Corrigan, Dr P Richardson, Associate Professor I Prince, Professor W Young, Associate Professor J Hurst, Professor S Campbell, Associate Professors T Luff, M Sim and M Page, Professors M King, M Evans and J Harris, Mr S Szewach, Mr C Wolfe, Ms N Lo’Ngok, Ms D Brown, Mr S Juster and Ms M Mahat. In attendance were: Mr C Vernon, Mr P Lawford, Mr P Yates and Ms K Wilson-Reid. M I N U T E SPART A PROCEDURAL AND POLICY MATTERS * 1. MEMBERSHIP AND APOLOGIESApologies were received from Professor G Webb, Mr C Avram, Dr T Patti, Associate Professor L Roller and Dr K Stewart. The Chair, Professor A Lindsay, welcomed to the meeting new and returning members Associate Professor D Garrioch, Associate Dean Teaching, Faculty of Arts – returning from OSP semester 1/2001, Professor S Joy, recently appointed Associate Dean Graduate Studies, Faculty of Business and Economics, Dr D Corrigan and Dr P Richardson, recently appointed to share the position of Associate Dean Teaching, Faculty of Education, and Ms N Lo’ngok, student member from the Monash Union of Berwick Students (MUBS). On behalf of the Committee, the Chair farewelled and extended thanks to retiring members Dr M Peel, Acting Associate Dean Teaching, Faculty of Arts (Acting ADT semester 1/2001), Associate Professor L Nethercott, previously Associate Dean Graduate Studies, Faculty of Business and Economics, Dr I Walker, previously Associate Dean Teaching, Faculty of Education, and Mr E Miller, MUBS. Professor Lindsay also welcomed Dr H Edwards, Acting Director, CHEQ, and Ms J Williams, Project Officer, IAS Students, who were in attendance for this meeting. * 2. STARRED ITEMSThe Committee noted that certain items had been starred as requiring discussion. Item 9A was added at the meeting. The Committee endorsed the recommendations for all items other than those starred. * 3. MINUTESThe Committee approved the Minutes of Meeting 3/2001, held 9 May 2001. Action/Information: Executive Officer 4. ITEMS OF INTEREST FROM ACADEMIC BOARD MEETING 4/2001 All matters from the last meeting of the Education Committee, Meeting 3/2001, were considered at Academic Board Meeting 3/2001. Therefore, there were no matters to report in relation to Education Committee business from Meeting 4/2001 of Academic Board. 5. EDUCATION COMMITTEE MEETING SCHEDULE 2002 RMO2001/1010 The Committee noted the 2002 schedule for Education Committee meetings, that was approved by the Chair, Professor A Lindsay, as set out below:
It was noted that all meetings of the Committee would be held in the Sir George Lush Room, ground floor of Administration Building 3A, Clayton campus. Action/Information: Members 6. COUNCIL CONSIDERATION OF COURSE PORTFOLIO OVERVIEW PAPER: ‘COURSE STRUCTURES FOR PROFESSIONAL AND EMPLOYMENT NEEDS’ RMO2000/0611 An extract from the minutes of Council Meeting 4/2001, held 25 June 2001, was circulated (p 1-2). The extract related to a report that was presented to the Council by the Deputy Vice-Chancellor (Academic and Planning), Professor A Lindsay, entitled ‘Course Structures for Professional and Employment Needs’. (A draft of the paper was considered at Education Committee Meeting 3/2001.) This paper was the second of a series of three overviews of the university’s course portfolio. The Education Committee noted the minute from Council Meeting 4/2001, regarding Council’s consideration of the report entitled "Course Structures for Professional and Employment Needs". * 7. QUALITY RMO2001/1011Professor G Webb, Director, Centre for Higher Education Quality (CHEQ), was an apology for this meeting. The acting Director of CHEQ, Dr H Edwards, attended the meeting and provided a verbal report on the university’s quality agenda. The Committee noted information regarding the universities to be audited in 2001/2002 (not including Monash), the release of the draft AUQA Audit Manual, current issues for attention and the composition of AUQA audit panels. Dr Edwards also informed the Committee about current quality activities at Monash involving ‘Institutional Self Review’, a project with particular faculties on graduate attributes, processes for subject reviews, finalisation of the online instrument for flexible learning and current activities of the Support Services group. The Chair thanked Dr Edwards for the report. It was agreed that CHEQ would distribute a copy of the draft AUQA Audit Manual to members following the meeting for reference. Members noted that comments about the draft could be relayed to CHEQ within the next two weeks. Action/Information: Dr H Edwards * 8. SPECIAL CONSIDERATION RMO2001/1012At its Meeting 7/2000, the Committee requested that faculties provide written reports regarding implementation of the university's special consideration principles and procedures, as approved at Academic Board Meeting 2/99, together with any feedback for consideration during their evaluation. The principles and procedures and the application form, together with the faculty reports on implementation, were circulated (p 3-58). A report from the Faculty of Engineering was emailed to members prior to the meeting and is attached at Attachment A. Professor M Evans, Director, Planning and Academic Affairs, spoke to this item and highlighted that the principles and procedures had been almost completely implemented by faculties and that they appeared to be working effectively overall. Professor Evans provided a summary of the feedback and suggestions received from the ten faculties. Discussion occurred and issues were raised including:
The Committee noted the faculty reports on implementation of the principles and procedures and made suggestions for refinement. It was agreed that Professor Evans, together with Mr K Bensley, Mr S Szewach and Associate Professor I Prince, would re-draft the principles and procedures and the application form, taking into consideration the suggestions made, for consideration at a later meeting. Action/Information: Professor M Evans; Mr K Bensley; Associate Professor I Prince; Mr S Szewach * 9. COURSE TITLING AND ABBREVIATION CONVENTIONS IN CALLISTA RMO1999/0650A paper was circulated that was presented by the IAS Project – Callista, in relation to course titling and abbreviation conventions in Callista (p 59-62). Mr P Yates, Director, Systems and Services, was in attendance and Ms J Williams, IAS Project – Change Team, attended the meeting for this item. The matter of standards for course titling and abbreviation was initially raised in late 2000, further to the Education Committee and Academic Board’s consideration of ‘popular’ course title abbreviations that included irregular punctuation and letter casing. The Education Committee noted, at its Meeting 7/2000, that the university did not at that time have a policy on standards for course titling. (The normal titling patterns followed by Australian universities are set out in the Commonwealth Universities Yearbook, located at: http://www.acu.ac.uk/home/index.html ) This paper sought endorsement of a set of university standards for course titling and abbreviation to ensure consistency of data entry into Callista. This consistent approach would also be reflected in the award titles printed on the university’s academic transcripts and testamurs. The suggestions put forward in the paper were based on examples of existing course titles and abbreviations currently used across the university. (For further reference, the university’s awards were located under Statute 6.1.2 – Courses and Degrees, at: http://www.monash.edu.au/pubs/calendar/statutes/statutes06.html#Heading137 ) Brief discussion occurred regarding the impact of the proposal on ‘popular’ course title abbreviations. The Education Committee approved the proposed set of university standards for course titling and abbreviation, for use in relation to Callista data entry, university transcripts and testamurs, as set out in the paper presented by the IAS Project. It was noted that reference to ‘double degree’ within the document would be amended to read ‘double degree course’. The Committee noted that the procedures would be lodged on the Policy Bank on the Secretariat website for reference. (Secretarial Note: Minor housekeeping amendments were made to the procedures following the meeting. It was also noted that research awards would be affected by the proposal. Accordingly, the proposal was forwarded to the Research Graduate School Committee for endorsement prior to lodgement of the procedures on the web.) Action/Information: Ms J Williams; Ms K Wilson-Reid; Ms P Herman; Mr T Calder; Faculty Managers 9A. ELECTRONICALLY SUPPORTED TEACHING AND LEARNING This item was added at the meeting by the Chair. Professor Lindsay advised the Committee regarding developments in this area including a university survey on the types of electronic support used, a survey for the purpose of DETYA profiles, and development of the third course overview paper on ‘Use of On-Line Technologies to Support Flexible Learning’. Professor J Harris, Director, CeLTS, informed members about the amount and accuracy of data that had been received for the Monash subject survey that had officially closed on 27 July. Members noted that, to date, less than half of the subject codes that were drawn from Callista prior the survey’s commencement on 12 July had been categorised. ADTs were asked to encouraged faculty staff to work further on the accuracy and content of data provided by mid-August. Professor Lindsay advised that the survey results would be circulated to the Committee together with an item about the third course overview paper at the next meeting. The Chair noted that Deans had been asked for faculties to provide brief papers outlining their strategies for on-line technologies to support teaching and learning that would feed into the next meeting. The office of the Deputy Vice-Chancellor would write to faculties to highlight requirements for this exercise prior to that meeting. Action/Information: Ms S Stafford; Associate Deans Teaching PART B: COURSE AND UNIT MATTERS Faculty Biannual Reports For Noting & Proposals Under Previous Approval System 10. FACULTY OF EDUCATION A document was circulated (p 63-64). Education Committee received and noted the Report of Meeting 2/2001 of the Board of the Faculty of Education, held 30 May 2001. Action/Information: Mr P Lawford 10.1 Ratification of course amendment previously approved RMO1997/1365 An amendment to the Bachelor of Business and Commerce / Bachelor of Sport and Outdoor Recreation was proposed in late 2000 by the Board of the Faculty of Business and Economics. This proposal was endorsed by the Education Committee and approved by the Academic Board at their respective meetings 1/2001, subject to endorsement by the Board of the Faculty of Education. The Education Committee noted that the major amendment to the Bachelor of Business and Commerce / Bachelor of Sport and Outdoor Recreation, that was approved by the Academic Board at its Meeting 1/2001 subject to ratification by the Board of the Faculty of Education, was ratified by that Board at its Meeting 2/2001. 11. FACULTY OF MEDICINE, NURSING AND HEALTH SCIENCES A document was circulated (p 65-66). The Education Committee received the Report of Meeting 4/2001 of the Board of the Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, held 4 July 2001. Action/Information: Mr M Lewenberg * 11.1 New Course Proposal – Bachelor of Biomedical Science (Honours) RMO1997/1365Documentation was circulated (p 67-74). The proposal under this item was underway in the Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, prior to the introduction of the devolved course and unit approval process from 21 March 2001. The course proposal indicated potential cross-faculty involvement with the Faculties of Science, Information Technology, Pharmacy and Engineering. The Committee noted that consultation and formal sign off by those faculties was underway. Honours Structure It was noted that this proposal involved a single, 48 point honours year with no break down into assessable components against which results could be recorded. A query was received regarding the university’s position on whether it was necessary to divide honours courses into assessable components (subjects/units). It was noted that considerable efforts had been made in the Faculty of Science and other faculties to achieve this divided structure based on an understanding that this was a university requirement. The Chair invited Professor M King, who had previously chaired the working party that prepared the university’s approved ‘Fourth Year Honours Programs - Guidelines for Good Practice’, to provide clarification on this matter. Professor King noted that whilst the ‘Guidelines for Good Practice’ currently permitted more than one structure for honours for the recording of results, it was preferable to divide honours into assessable components for several reasons including that:
Discussion occurred about aspects and further benefits of honours division. In relation to the university’s position on the break down of honours courses into assessable components, the Committee agreed that Professor M King, together with Associate Professor M Page, Associate Professor T Luff and interested student members, would draft an appropriate position statement with a view to its inclusion in policy. Consultation would occur with the Director, Planning and Academic Affairs, Professor M Evans, prior to the draft being returned to the Committee for consideration. It was noted that the proposal under this item was not restricted by the university’s current official position on the above matter. Associate Professor Luff noted that the Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences would work towards further break down of honours as required in the case that the university policy on this matter was clarified. The Education Committee endorsed for submission to Academic Board the proposal of the Board of the Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences to establish the Bachelor of Biomedical Science (Honours), to be offered on campus at the Clayton campus, commencing semester one, 2002. Action/Information: Professor M King; Associate Professor M Page; Associate Professor T Luff 12. BIANNUAL FACULTY REPORTS ON APPROVED COURSE & UNIT DEVELOPMENTS RMO2000/0611 Documentation was circulated (p 75-112). Under the new integrated academic and resource planning approach, including the devolved course and unit approval process (operational since 21 March 2001), faculties report approved course and unit developments biannually to the Education Committee for noting. At Education Committee Meeting 2/2001, a schedule was set with the first round of biannual reports to be submitted across Education Committee meetings 4/2001 and 5/2001. Biannual reports were received from the Faculties of Arts, Business and Economics and Law. The Faculty of Pharmacy advised that no course or unit developments had been approved by the Faculty Board since the introduction of the devolved approach. It was noted that the Faculty of Education would provide a report to the next meeting. For reference, the proforma for faculties to report biannually to the Education Committee about their approved course and unit developments for noting was located at: http://www.adm.monash.edu.au/unisec/res/cds/index.html The Education Committee received and noted the biannual reports of course and unit developments presented by the Faculties of Arts, Business and Economics and Law, and noted that the Faculty of Pharmacy had no course or unit developments to report for this mid-year cycle of biannual reporting. (Secretarial Note: Associate Professor D Garrioch, Associate Dean Teaching, Faculty of Arts, noted subsequent to the meeting that one amendment was required to the Arts Faculty biannual report on agenda page 78. The report would be amended to delete reference to the course amendment involving the ‘Major in English-in Use in the BA’.) Action/Information: Ms K Wilson-Reid; Ms L Harris 13. LIBRARY IMPACT STATEMENT RMO1997/0395 The Library Impact Statement for the period January to June 2001 was circulated (p 113-114). The Education Committee noted the Library Impact Statement, provided by the University Library, for the period January to June 2001. Action/Information: Ms M Pernat PART C: NEXT MEETING The next scheduled meeting of the Education Committee (Meeting 5/2001) will be held at 2:15 pm on Wednesday, 26 September 2001. Submissions for that agenda are due by 12 September 2001. Further information about the Education Committee is located on the University Secretariat website at: http://www.adm.monash.edu.au/unisec/com/ec/index.html Membership: Professor Alan Lindsay (Chair) Associate Professor David Garrioch Dr Denise Cuthbert Mr Karen Bensley Professor Alan Farley Professor Sally Joy Dr Debbie Corrigan & Dr Paul Richardson Associate Professor Ian Prince Professor William Young Associate Professor John Hurst Mr Chris Avram Professor Susan Campbell Associate Professor Tony Luff Associate Professor Malcolm Sim Associate Professor Michael Page Dr Tony Patti Associate Professor Louis Roller Professor Peter Stewart Professor Max King Professor Merran Evans Professor John Harris Professor Graham Webb Mr Simon Szewach (MONSU – Caulfield) Mr Colin Wolfe (MONSU – Peninsula) Ms Natalie Lo-Ngok (MUBS) Ms Deb Brown (MSA) Mr Sharn Juster (MUGSU) Ms Marian Mahat (MPA – Masters) In Attendance: Mr Clive Vernon Mr Peter Lawford Mr Peter Marshall (alternate Mr Peter Yates) Ms Kerri Wilson-Reid (Executive Officer) Further Distribution: Faculty Managers/Registrars (*9) Mr T Calder Mr D Mernagh Ms C Holland Ms P Herman Ms S Stafford Mr B Eddy Ms M Fairbanks Ms L Davies
Education Committee Meeting 4/2001 Additional Paper - Item 8 - Attachment A
Report to University Education Committee Special Consideration Procedures The Faculty of Engineering has sought to implement the principles and procedures for Special Consideration as approved by Academic Board 2/99. The Faculty has not sought to develop policies and procedures beyond those set out in the University published policy statement, but has moved recently to clarify and strengthen procedures that may apply to special (deferred) examinations that may arise as a consequence of a special consideration application (EEC 2/2001). Eligibility Details of eligibility and manner of application are set out under the sub-section, Assessment procedures, of the Engineering Faculty entry in the Student Resources Guide (wording from 2001 Handbook set out below). Similar information is set out in the ‘Engineering Index’ a reference booklet prepared by the Faculty Academic Advisor, distributed to first year Engineering students, as well as on the standard application form. Where Schools and/or Departments maintain an undergraduate handbook (e.g. Dept Electrical & Computer Systems Engineering) the same information is also included. The Engineering Faculty is currently reviewing its Faculty web-site with the intention of upgrading the quality and amount of information available to students (and staff) in regard to policy matters and ensure all relevant application forms are accessible electronically. Applications Applications for special consideration must be submitted to the Manager (Undergraduate Student Services) not more than 48 hours after the applicant’s last scheduled examination, using the appropriate form (standard University proforma with minor Faculty customisation). If medical grounds form the basis for the application, and the student wishes such information to remain confidential, they must consult the Manager (Undergraduate Student Services). The application form clearly states that medical certificates stating ‘medical condition’ are not acceptable, and more specific detail is required. Two copies of applications are to be submitted and stamped by designated Faculty personnel, with one copy returned to the student as verification of submission. Implementation The Engineering Faculty Board of examiners has delegated the responsibility for assessing special consideration applications to the relevant Department or School sectional boards of examiners, to which applications for special consideration are forwarded as appropriate, or to the level one sectional board of examiners (common first year). The application is considered together with any other factors in reaching a decision on outcome. The consideration is made across the entire grade distribution, not just at the pass/fail boundary. No attempt has been made in the Faculty to develop formulae for the award of additional marks in the event of successful application as is sometimes the case elsewhere. Departments/Schools report the outcome of the consideration of the application at meetings of examination results working parties, where the results in any semester are finalised and ratified on behalf of the Faculty Board of Examiners. Special consideration and deferred examinations Extract from 2001 Student Resource Guide, Engineering Faculty entry "A student whose performance during a semester or during an examination period is adversely affected by illness or other serious cause may apply for special consideration, and this will be taken into account by the board of examiners when determining the student's results for the subjects affected. If the student misses an examination through illness or is so ill during an examination as to be unable to do justice to his or her real abilities, the student may apply for a special (deferred) examination. In all cases appropriate documentation, which in the case of illness will be a medical certificate, must be provided. Application forms for special consideration can be obtained from the faculty's administration office on each campus. Part A of the form asks for general details, and part B is a medical certificate which should be filled in by the attending medical practitioner in the case of illness. Students should note that medical certificates stating that the student suffered from a 'medical/surgical condition' will not be accepted. All applications for special consideration, and in particular medical certificates, will be treated in strict confidence." A/Prof. Ian Prince Associate Dean (Teaching) 30 July 2001
|