Meeting 1/2006 of the Education Committee was held on Wednesday, 8 March
2006, in the Sir George Lush Room, Building 3a, Clayton campus, between 2:15
pm and 4:40 pm.
Professor S Parker (Chair), Ms J Allen, Dr H Kreutz,
Professor O Hughes, Associate Professor S Joy, Associate Professors B Doecke
and G Codner, Professors W Young and D Arnott, Drs J Paterson and L McCall,
Associate Professor L Roller, Drs D Taylor and C Varsavsky, Ms E Greco, Mr T
Brown, Mr C Holmes, Professor M King, Associate Professor J Hurst,
Professors M Evans, G Webb and D Murphy, Mr C Vernon, Ms C Cooze, Professor
P Steele, Ms S Le Grand, Mr M Hatwell, Associate Professor M Page, Mr N
Wilkins and Ms A Shelton.
Associate Professor T Luff, Mr K Slywa, Ms S Bell and Mr
P Yates.
*1. MEMBERSHIP AND
ATTENDANCE
On behalf of the Committee the Chair thanked outgoing
members for their contribution to the committee: Professor Robin Alfredson,
Dr Debbie Corrigan and Associate Professor Marg Lindorff. The Chair welcomed
the new members and the Committee members identified themselves by way of
introduction.
The Committee welcomed those invited to attend for their
respective items below:
*2. STARRED ITEMS
The Committee noted that certain items had been starred
as requiring discussion and endorsed the recommendations for all items other
than those starred.
*3. MINUTES
The unconfirmed minutes of meeting 6/2005 held on 26
October 2005, were circulated on 5 December 2005 in hard copy, and on the
agenda.
The minutes of Education Committee Meeting 6/2005 were
approved.
4. MATTERS ARISING FROM THE MINUTES
Documentation was circulated and the Chair spoke to this item.
Professor Parker advised that it was timely to revisit the Terms of
Reference, as a mechanism for updating and to reflect on the role of the
Committee in terms of reviewing quality and standards.
The Education Committee was informed of the proposal to consolidate
the existing subcommittees of Education Committee under two main
subcommittees, noting that the majority of subcommittees and working
parties of Education Committee established under the Learning and
Teaching Plan 2003-2005 had produced reports, been absorbed into central
services or been formally disestablished.
The Committee agreed to the establishment, with provisional names, of
the:
The Chair advised that under statutory provisions, Associate Deans
Teaching must convene to meet (refer to note below). In order to
minimise any duplication with what is currently called the Committee of
Associate Deans Teaching (CADeT), it is proposed that the Teaching and
Learning Subcommittee membership would include all Associate Deans
Teaching within the meaning of the statute. The establishment of the
Teaching and Learning Subcommittee would, therefore, subsume CADeT,
which would cease to meet separately.
A number of working parties would operate under these subcommittees.
It is anticipated that the Quality Subcommittee would be rolled into the
Teaching and Learning Subcommittee and the Exclusion Procedures
Subcommittee would be one of the working parties of the Academic Policy
and Programs Subcommittee.
The Education Committee noted that the Education Committee Terms of
Reference would be reorganised to reflect the updated subcommittee
structure. Associate Deans Teaching were invited to join in the new
subcommittees, noting that there would be a crossover of memberships in
the new groups, and further information about the terms of reference for
the Education Committee, Teaching and Learning Subcommittee and the
Academic Policy and Programs Subcommittee would be formalised and
presented to the Committee at its next meeting.
2.1 Subject to the general supervision of the academic board, the
associate deans (teaching) shall meet to consider any matter -
2.1.1 relating to teaching and learning in the University, or
2.1.2 referred to them by the academic board or its education committee
or by the committee of deans.
Action/Information: Professor G Webb, Professor M Evans,
Chair, Associate Professor T Luff, Dr H Kreutz, Associate
Professor M Lindorff
The Education Committee received and noted the version of the
Education Plan 2006-10 that would be submitted to Council 2/06 for
formal approval.
*4.3 Biannual Faculty
Reports on Approved Course and Unit Developments RMO2000/0611
Documentation was circulated. The Committee noted that the biannual
faculty reporting for 2004 and 2005 was completed and up-to-date.
The Education Committee received and noted the
Faculty of Education biannual report of approved course and unit
developments for December 2004.
Documentation was tabled at the meeting and is attached to the
minutes. Ms Ann Shelton, Solicitors Office, provided an update of this
item.
Members were advised that the Faculty Awards regulations had not been
updated to include all courses listed under Callista and Kronos. The
University Solicitor’s Office will notify faculties of the requirements
and provide an update at the next meeting.
Action: The Education Committee received and noted
the report provided by Ms A Shelton regarding the update of Faculty
Awards Regulations.
Documentation was tabled and is attached to the minutes.
Professor Merran Evans, Pro Vice-Chancellor (Planning), spoke to
this item. Ms Shona Le Grand, University Planning and Statistics,
was in attendance.
The Committee concurred that this exercise was beneficial for
monitoring faculty processes on grading and average marks. Members
noted the advice from Professor Evans and further noted this
exercise would inform the development of a university-wide policy on
grading. The Committee agreed that the exercise would be undertaken
and reported back to the Education Committee on an annual basis.
The Education Committee noted the following areas for further
focus, including:
Professor Evans acknowledged the input of Ms Le Grand in leading
the project on data compilation and analysis.
The full distribution of grades and average marks analysis is
available at:
http://www.ups.monash.edu/academic/analyses/grading/.
Action: The Education Committee:
-
received and noted the updated summary
analysis paper and faculty feedback on distribution of grades
and average marks; and
-
noted that a university-wide policy on grade
distributions/moderation/external input and grading descriptors
would be developed.
Action/Information: members
*4.5.2
Survey of Group of Eight (Go8) Grading Scales and Descriptors
Documentation was circulated and the Chair spoke
to this item. The Chair highlighted the references to graduate
attributes in the Go8 grading descriptors and suggested the
development of a university-wide set of grading descriptors has a
strong connection to the Monash graduate attributes.
Members noted that grading descriptors were found
in some faculties. Associate Deans Teaching were requested to
forward faculty grading descriptors to Ms Shona Le Grand (Shona.Legrand@adm.monash.edu.au)
by Wednesday 15 March 2006 towards the development of a
university-wide statement.
Action: The Education Committee:
Action/Information: members, Ms S Le Grand
*4.6 Academic Year
Working Party
The Chair provided a verbal report on this item. The working party
had gathered information from various Australian universities and made
an initial assessment on various options of semester timetabling. A
proposal will be submitted to Meeting 2/2006 to consider possible models
of semester length including a swot vac week.
Members noted the advice from one member that three
universities from the Group of Eight are reportedly considering moving
the start of second semester to September to align with universities
from the northern hemisphere.
Action: The Education Committee noted the advice of
the Chair regarding the progress of the Academic Year Working Party and
a forthcoming proposal on semester timetabling to be presented at the
next meeting.
Action/Information: members
5. ITEMS OF INTEREST FROM ACADEMIC BOARD MEETING 6/2005
RMO2004/0611
Members noted that the Academic Board had noted all
matters that were submitted via the Report of Meeting 6/2005 of the
Education Committee.
*6.
EDUCATION POLICIES AND PROCEDURES RMO2000/0766
Professor Merran Evans, Pro Vice-Chancellor (Planning), spoke to this
item.
Following the review of academic policies at Meeting 5/2006, a review
schedule of Education Policies and Procedures from the Policy Bank was
circulated. Members were informed that the Office of the Pro Vice-Chancellor
(Planning) would be distributing various policies requiring review to
faculties, for further advice and consultation.
Members noted that an Education Policies and Procedures Folder,
containing a printed copy of the Policy Bank as at February 2006, would be
distributed to senior academic and administrative staff in the coming weeks.
Professor Evans advised that the review would inform a project on the
framework and governance of the University’s Policy and Procedures, led by
Dr Kristina Macrae.
Members noted the suggestion that CALT be added to the Consultation and
Coordination component for the Induction of New Academic Staff
Policy/Procedures.
Members further noted that the Education Policies and Procedures Review
Schedule would be reported back to Academic Board.
Action: The Education Committee:
- noted the activities relating to education policy review in 2006; and
- provided comments on the policy review schedule.
Action/Information: Ms N Mitchell, Ms S Le Grand
*7.
COURSE APPROVAL PROCESS
*7.1 Report on the
Review of Course Proposals, New Units and Course RMO1997/1365
Amendments
The Chair introduced the item and provided background on the course
approval system at Monash following the devolution of course approval
authority to
faculties for new courses and central
approval authority of course changes that fell into one of the six
defined categories of university-level strategic significance in 2000.
Members noted the area of course approvals was identified as an area of
high priority for the university to address in 2006.
As reported in Meeting 6/2005, Monash commissioned Ms Eileen Wilson,
consultant, to undertake a review of 2004 faculty biannual reports to
the Education Committee. The results of the audit consultant’s review of
2004 new course proposals, new units, and course amendments, were
circulated. Professor Merran Evans, Pro Vice-Chancellor (Planning), was
invited to speak to this item. Ms Shona Le Grand, Executive Officer,
University Planning and Statistics, was in attendance.
The Committee noted the recommendations of the report and the
auditor’s comments. Members considered the recommendations from the
report as outlined below:
New Course Proposals
That the University provide further explanation
about reporting responsibilities in terms of the Strategic
Significance Categories (SSC).
That the course approval template be redesigned.
That the attachments be embedded in the document.
That the position regarding sign-off of course
proposals be clarified, especially in relation to budget costing
models.
That faculties be made aware of the Course
Profitability Model as a tool for evaluating new courses after the
first year of operation.
New Unit Proposals
That a mechanism be considered for cross-checking
whether similar units exist in other parts of the University at the
time of proposing a new unit proposal.
That mechanisms be considered for notifying other
faculties that may be affected by the introduction of a new unit.
Course Amendments
That, if appropriate, the university clarifies the
position in regard to maintaining a distinction between minor and
major change proposals and, concomitantly, whether there is a need for
separate forms at the faculty level.
That mechanisms be considered for notifying other
faculties that may be affected by course amendments.
On the issue of major / minor course amendment for coursework
proposals, Professor Evans confirmed that the definitions were available
from the Planning and Statistics website (url:
http://www.ups.monash.edu.au/academic/course/).
The Committee noted comments regarding the integration of the Library
Impact/Technology Statements, as utilised in some faculties, for the
purpose of the course proposal.
The Committee endorsed the recommendations of the report and, on the
advice of the Chair, the Committee noted that mechanisms for
implementation are to be referred to the Academic Policy and Programs
Subcommittee for consideration. The suggested mechanisms for
implementation will be reported back to the Education Committee.
Action: The Education Committee:
- received the consultant report on the review of new course
proposals, new units and course amendments; and
- endorsed the recommendations with respect to new course
proposals, new unit proposals and course amendments.
Action/Information: Professor M Evans
*7.2 Course Approval
Processes in Other Australian Universities RMO1997/1365
Documentation was circulated. The Chair spoke to this item which
provided an analysis of Australian universities’ course approval
processes and outlines a proposed approach for Monash.
The Committee noted the extent of universities that provided course
approvals under the Academic Board and Council, and including course
approving committees. The Committee further noted a suggested framework
and criteria for course approvals, consisting of four essential
criteria:
- Academic Case;
- Business Case;
- Strategic Case; and
- Occasions for Use.
Members considered the framework and the following observations were
received:
- the suggestion to add a statement on pedagogy in the academic
case criteria; and
- possible implications on offshore offerings.
In considering the future process for Monash, the Committee agreed to
refer the issue to the Academic Policy and Programs Subcommittee to
propose recommendations for change. The Chair advised that any proposals
for amendments to the course approval process would be submitted back to
the Education Committee by the last meeting of 2006.
Action: The Education Committee:
- noted the course approval processes in other Australian
universities;
- considered the proposed approach for Monash and the matter is to
be referred to the Academic Policy and Programs Subcommittee for
consideration; and
- noted that a proposal from the Academic Policy and Programs
Subcommittee on the proposed course approval process will be
submitted to the Education Committee at its Meeting 6/06 in October
2006.
Action/Information: Professor M Evans
*7.3 Bachelor of
Biotechnology with Honours RMO1997/1365
Documentation was circulated. Associate Professor Michael Page,
Faculty of Science, was invited to attend to speak to this item, as one
of the proposers of the course.
The Committee received the proposal of a four-year degree with a
compulsory honours year, with an exit after three years with a degree of
a different name for students who did not achieve the honours level
results. Students not meeting the requirement to the fourth stage of the
course would be able to graduate with a Bachelor of Science
(Biotechnology). The program would be offered under the Bachelor Degree
with Honours qualifications category.
The Committee noted the proposal sought approval for an average mark
of at least 70 in at least 24 points of level three units. Members noted
that approval for a hurdle requirement above a pass level for
progression within a course required endorsement from the Education
Committee and the qualifications issue was being brought to the
Committee’s attention for discussion.
The Committee considered the proposal and the following comments were
received, including:
- the possibility of juxtaposing the Bachelor of Science
(Biotechnology) as an entry pathway into the honours program.
Associate Professor Page stated that the Bachelor of Science
(Biotechnology) was a degree that was already available and the
proposed Bachelor of Biotechnology with Honours was designed as a
specialised program with a set course structure;
- concerns regarding whether students should be allowed to graduate
with a different degree title than the one they had initially
undertaken;
- the need to communicate implicitly to students that they were
likely to graduate with a different degree title to minimise any
confusion for potential candidates;
- possible ESOS implications;
- support from members for the proposal;
- support from members for a program, in line with programs offered
by the Faculties of Engineering, Law and Pharmacy, whereby students
exit at the end of four years, with or without honours, depending on
their aggregate results; and
- that the Faculty identify potential alternative degree names.
Associate Professor Page confirmed that the increased hurdle
requirement was set to ensure high-level entry criteria into the honours
program and laboratory research project, which was significantly driven
by industry requirements. Members noted the proposed honours program
structure was distinct to the standard honours program in the Faculty of
Science.
After much consideration the Education Committee did not reach a
unanimous decision with regard to the proposed four-year honours
program. On the advice of the Chair, the Committee did not ratify the
proposal recommendations as outlined below:
-
that the Bachelor of Biotechnology with Honours
course, being ‘professionally-based’ and having been developed
following detailed industry consultations, is consistent with the
key requirements for a ‘Bachelor Degree with Honours’ course at
Monash University and may be offered under that qualification
category; and
-
that to progress to stage-4 of the Bachelor of
Biotechnology with Honours course, students must have completed all
of the stage 1-3 requirements and have achieved an average mark of
at least 70 in at least 24 points of level-3 units (including
BTH3022).
The Committee further noted that the Bachelor of Psychology with
Honours was also being proposed using the same criteria of a four-year
program, with an exit after three years with a different degree title.
The matter is currently being considered by the Pro Vice-Chancellor
(Planning).
Action: The Education Committee discussed the recommendations of the
proposal to establish a new four-year cross-faculty Bachelor of
Biotechnology with Honours program.
After much consideration the Education Committee deferred
consideration of the structure of the course, and in particular the
question of the qualification that would be offered to students who
passed their subjects but did not qualify for honours, The Committee
referred the matter to the soon-to-be established Biotechnology Board of
Studies for further examination.
Action/Information: Ms G Key, Associate Professor T
Luff
*8.
REVIEW OF SPECIAL CONSIDERATION PROCEDURES RMO2001/1012
Documentation was circulated and Mr Mark Hatwell, Student Administration,
was invited to attend the meeting for this item. The Education Committee
noted the review of Special Consideration Procedures by a working party
convened by Mr Peter Yates, Student and Community Services Division, to
achieve a university-wide approach to evaluating special consideration
applications. The Special Consideration Procedures are available at:
http://www.adm.monash.edu.au/execserv/policies/
Academic-Policies/procedures/special-consideration.html
The Committee accepted the recommendations of the working
party with respect to:
Use of form within semester
a) in line with the policy, faculties allow
students to submit the standard special consideration application
form at any time of the semester, ie. for assessment within semester
as well as end-of-semester assessment,
b) the application form be updated to avoid
ambiguity in relation to end-of and within-semester assessment, and
c) application form data is entered on Callista
for within-semester and end-of-semester applications.
Accompanying documentation
-
that all
faculties require the Professional Practitioner’s Statement on the
application form to be completed for applications based on medical
or psychological grounds, with adequate supporting evidence, either
on the form or as attached documentation.
Evaluation of applications
Notification of application outcomes
a) the Special Consideration procedures and
application form be amended to allow students to be notified of the
outcome of their special consideration application and
b) Student Systems undertake the project to
provide system notification to students via WES.
Collection of data
Faculties provided feedback to the recommendations, including a
suggestion that a column be added to clarify if the application was directed
to an exam or an assessment. In response to a query, Mr Hatwell confirmed
that applications for various assessments could be lodged by the student
under the one application form. The Committee concurred that the
recommendations were an improvement to the processes and provided positive
feedback towards the initiatives.
The Committee noted the advice from Mr Hatwell that the data on the
student’s application should be kept on record for the duration of the
student’s enrolment.
Action: The Education Committee:
-
accepted the recommendations of the working party;
-
approved the changes to the Special Consideration
Procedures and Special Consideration Application Form;
-
noted the exemplars of disadvantage/affect matrices
for special consideration; and
-
considered an amendment to the Policy that required
all faculties to use common procedures.
Action/Information: Mr M Hatwell, Ms N Mitchell
*9.
POLICY – ACADEMIC PROGRAMS OFFERED FROM MULTIPLE CAMPUSES RMO2006/0015
Professor Phillip Steele, Pro Vice-Chancellor (Campus Coordination), was
invited to speak to this item. The Committee noted the policy on academic
programs offered from multiple campuses and the summary of cross campus
units.
The Committee noted that Monash had a large number of units offered on
more than one campus which highlighted the need for academic policies
surrounding units offered on more than one campus. The policy consists of
three components:
-
Courses that are offered on several campuses;
-
Study on more than one campus; and
-
Units offered from more than one campus.
Professor Steele stated that the policy would be used as a guide for
faculties to identify any approaches with domestic or offshore campuses. The
Committee made some suggested changes to the wording of the policy,
including:
1. Courses that are offered on from several
campuses,
2.3 Permanent campus transfers, and
welcomed the document as an example of good practice.
Action: Noting the minor modifications agreed to at the
meeting, the Education Committee approved the draft policy on Academic
Programs Offered from Multiple Campuses, for submission to Academic Board.
Action/Information: Ms N Mitchell
10. INTERNATIONAL
STUDENT PROFILE 2005 RMO1998/1792
The Education Committee noted the briefing paper on the
International Student Profile for 2005.
*11. OPEN UNIVERSITIES
AUSTRALIA – MONASH OFFERINGS RMO2002/0425
Professor Merran Evans, Pro Vice-Chancellor (Planning)
spoke to this item.
The Committee was informed of the OUA courses and units
offered by Monash, noting that Monash had oversight over these offerings.
Professor Evans thanked Ms Shona Le Grand for her work in the audit.
Members noted that a strategic review of OUA operations
was currently being undertaken.
Action: The Education Committee received and noted the
OUA courses and units offered by Monash University.
Action/Information: members
*12. PLAGIARISM
EDUCATION AND PREVENTION (PEP) PROJECT
RMO2002/1299
*12.1 PEP Project
Evaluation Recommendation and Findings
Mr Noel Wilkins, PEP Project Officer, was invited to attend the
meeting to speak to this item.
Members noted that the plagiarism project would be completed in April
2006 and a report of the project’s deliverables and recommendations was
circulated.
Mr Wilkins confirmed that the University-wide licence for Turnitin
software had lapsed in November 2005. Members noted no decision had been
made on whether faculties would be in a position to take up Turnitin in
2006. A repository of strategies to assist staff and students about
plagiarism is available at:
http://www.monash.edu.au/teaching/academic-integrity/
The Committee accepted the project recommendations as outlined below:
- to endorse the Plagiarism Policy, for submission to Academic
Board;
- to approve the Plagiarism Procedures;
- to note:
1. Ongoing Coordination
1.1 Ongoing project implementation, coordination and
development, including resource production and website
maintenance can rest with the Centre for the Advancement of
Learning and Teaching (CALT).
1.2 Implementation, monitoring and further development of
policy can rest with Education Committee.
1.3 Turnitin technical issues such as WebCT/Turnitin
Powerlink implementation and technical support can rest with
Information Technology Services.
1.4 Widen/intensify communications to ensure all faculties,
schools and departments, including off-shore campuses, are aware
of the resources available within the university and its and
faculties.
1.5 The Melbourne-Monash Committee for Collaboration in
Educational Technologies is developing "a set of web-based
multimedia learning resources that support university staff to
undertake professional development about academic
honesty/integrity issues, especially plagiarism, related to
university teaching and research activities broadly." (UM MDHS
BMU 2005)
2. Pedagogy
2.1. Faculties should ensure that sufficient educational
material and programs are made available to teaching staff to
ensure that the necessary skills and knowledge are held to
remove the need and opportunity for students to plagiarise and
cheat.
2.2. Faculties should ensure that students receive
sufficient information on citing and referencing to minimise
the incidents of unintentional plagiarism.
2.3. Faculties may wish to consider the recommended
pedagogical approach for student education produced by the
project (see attachment 2).
3. Plagiarism detection software
3.1. Negotiations have commenced with iParadigms (Turnitin)
and a preference is held for a Standard Department Plan, which
briefly is as follows:
- Term – 12 months;
- Each nominating
faculty needs to pre-set their student enrolment limit (SEL);
- SEL is fixed and non
transferable, however additional "students" can be purchased
in 1000 blocks for USD800 – (for use during original term);
- Faculties and SEL
need to be determined before licence activation;
- User faculties to
administer.
Action: The Education Committee received and noted the
recommendations of the Plagiarism Education and Prevention Project.
Action/Information: Professor D Murphy
*12.2 Plagiarism
Policy and Procedures
Following discussion of Item 12.1, the Committee approved the Policy
(for submission to Academic Board) and Procedures for Plagiarism.
Action: The Education Committee:
- approved the Plagiarism Policy, for submission to Academic Board;
and
- approved the Plagiarism Procedures.
Action/Information: members
*13. LEARNING AND
TEACHING PERFORMANCE FUND (LTPF) MEASURES RMO2003/1412
The Education Committee received and noted the statistics
on a comparison of Monash by field of study of Go8 universities from
2000-2004. Members noted the strategies that the University would be
implementing to encourage a greater response rates to the Course Experience
and Graduate Destination Questionnaires, noting these were the indicators
for funding under Stage 2 of the LTPF allocations. Members noted the value
of this data in informing policy and strategic planning.
The full report is available from:
http://www.ups.monash.edu.au/academic/
analyses/LTPF/LTPF-edited.pdf
Action: The Education Committee received and noted the
statistics on a comparison of Monash by field of study of Go8 universities
from 2000-2004.
Action/Information: Associate Deans Teaching
*14. OTHER BUSINESS
*14.1 Ancillary Fees
Professor Merran Evans spoke to this item. The Education Committee
noted the advice regarding ancillary fees that students must be able to
complete their course without incurring additional fees. Members noted,
as a guide, that it was acceptable to provide electronic copies of
on-campus lectures; however, it was not acceptable to instruct students
to print out each lecture and bring it to class so they can follow it.
Further reference is available from the DEST
Administrative Information for Providers (AIP) 2005, available at:
http://www.dest.gov.au/sectors/higher_education/
policy_issues_reviews/key_issues/AIP_2005/default.htm
Action: The Education Committee noted the advice from
the Pro Vice-Chancellor (Planning) regarding ancillary fees.
Action/Information: members, Faculty Managers
*14.2 Portfolio
Exemplar
A document was distributed from the Pro
Vice-Chancellor (Quality) with a request to Faculties to provide an
exemplar in the area of education (teaching, learning, assessment,
curriculum development, services etc) from their faculty.
Action: The Education Committee received the document
from the Pro Vice-Chancellor (Quality) regarding exemplars in the area
of education.
Action/Information: members
PART B: FACULTY REPORTS AND PROPOSALS
The Education Committee approved the schedule for submission of biannual
reports of approved course and unit developments for noting by Education
Committee:
PART C: NEXT MEETING
The next scheduled meeting of the Education Committee
(Meeting 2/2006) will be held at
2:15 pm on Wednesday, 19 April 2006.
All final submissions for the agenda for that meeting are due by
Wednesday, 29 March 2006.
Note change of venue to Meeting 5/06 – this meeting will be held at
Clayton campus.
Membership:
Professor Stephen Parker (Chair)
Ms Jenny Allen
Dr Heinz Kreutz
Professor Owen Hughes
Professor Tony Dingle
Associate Professor Sally Joy
Associate Professor Brenton Doecke
Associate Professor Gary Codner
Professor William Young
Professor David Arnott
Dr Jeannie Paterson
Associate Professor Tony Luff
Dr Louise McCall
Associate Professor Louis Roller
Dr David Taylor
Dr Cristina Varsavsky
Dr Tony Patti
Professor Max King
Associate Professor John Hurst
Professor Merran Evans
Professor Graham Webb
Professor David Murphy
Ms Glenda Key
Ms Emily Greco, MONSU – Caulfield
Mr Tim Brown, MONSU – Peninsula
Mr Chris Holmes, MSA – Clayton
Mr David Hayes, MUBS – Berwick
Mr Kirk Slywa, MUGSU - Gippsland
Pharmacy Students Association – position vacant
Mr Leslie Whiteley - MPA masters by coursework
MPA – graduate/postgraduate diploma – position vacant
In Attendance:
Mr Clive Vernon
Mr Peter Yates (alternate for Mr P Marshall)
Ms Christine Cooze (alternate for Ms Cathrine Harboe-Ree)
Ms Sue Bell
Ms Shana Chong (Secretary)
Further Distribution:
Faculty Managers/Registrars (*9)
Mr T Calder
Ms P Williams
Ms P Herman
RMO
