Council Meeting 1-2002
Council was held between 5.00 pm and 7.20 pm on Monday, 11
February 2002, in the Sir George Lush Room, Administration
Building 3a, Clayton Campus
There were present:
Mr J K Ellis, Chancellor, Presiding
Mr P H Ramler AM, Deputy Chancellor
Dr J M Hearn, Deputy Chancellor
Professor D A Robinson, Vice-Chancellor and President
Professor A W Lindsay, Chair of Academic Board
|
Mr G Barnes
Ms M Blencowe
Professor C Bourke MBE
Ms D Halstead
Mr J Hutchinson
Mr J Laurie
|
Miss D R Pizzey AM
Ms A Sherry
Professor T Sridhar
Ms E Tava
Dr C Williams |
In attendance were:
Ms W Peter
Dr B Robinson
Professor P LeP Darvall, Deputy Vice-Chancellor and
Vice-President (Research and Development)
Ms A Crook AO, Deputy Vice-Chancellor and Vice-President
(Resources)
Professor Chris Cocklin, Professor and Director, Monash
Environment Institute
Mr David Phillips, Special Advisor to the Vice-Chancellor
and President
Professor Graham Webb, Director, Centre for Higher
Education Quality
Secretary:
Mr T Calder, Director, Secretariat and Executive Services
MINUTES
The Deputy Chancellor, Mr Paul Ramler AM, informed
Council that following involved and detailed negotiations, a joint venture
between the International Olympic Committee (IOC) and Monash University
establishing Olympic Games Knowledge Services (O.G.K.S.) would be launched
on 19 February 2002. [Secretarial note: copies of press releases are
attached for information. Attachment 1)]
Olympic Games Knowledge Services would deliver a range of
education, management and consulting services to Olympic Games organising
committees and candidate cities.
Following an explanation of the shareholder structure and
board membership, Mr Ramler informed Council that Mr Craig McLatchey,
formerly Secretary-General of the Australian Olympic Committee, had been
appointed to the position of Director, Olympic Games Knowledge Services.
The Chancellor welcomed Dr Carol Williams following her
election to membership of Council. Further, Council was informed that Mr Kim
Bannikoff, appointed to Council by the Minister for Post Compulsory
Education, Training and Employment, had resigned from Council due to a
change of responsibilities within the Department of Education, Employment
and Training.
Council was informed that media broadcasts heard that
afternoon indicated that a Cabinet reshuffle had occurred resulting in
changes within the Education Ministries. (Secretarial note: subsequent to
the meeting, it was announced that The Honourable Lynne Kosky MP had been
appointed Minister for Education and Training.)
1. Procedural Matters
1.1 Apologies
Apologies were received from Associate Professor Louise Adler and Ms Penelope Hutchinson.
1.2 Special Leave
Council approved a request for special
leave for meeting 2/2002 (18 March) from Ms Eleina Tava.
2. Confirmation of Minutes of Previous Meeting
The Minutes of meeting No 8/2001 held on 17
December 2001 were circulated.
RESOLUTION CL 1/2002/1
Council confirmed the Minutes of meeting No
8/2001 held on Monday, 17 December 2001 subject to the insertion of
the following as the penultimate paragraph of minute 3.1 Report
on the annual round of discussions with Council members:
On behalf of Council, the Chancellor
congratulated Ms Dale Halstead on her re-election to Council for a
further two-year term (item 12.5 refers) and informed Council that
Dr Paul James had resigned from Council as he had accepted the
position of Professor of Globalization at RMIT. On behalf of
Council, the Chancellor extended his congratulations and recorded
his appreciation for Dr James’ contribution to the work of Council.
2.1 Nominations for the Award of Honorary Degrees
RESOLUTION CL1/2002/2
Council approved, without discussion, the
recommendation of the Honorary Degrees Committee for the
award of honorary degrees as presented orally by the
Chancellor, Mr Jerry Ellis.
3. Vice-Chancellor’s Business: Council meetings 01/2002 to
08/2002
The Vice-Chancellor introduced the paper
Vice-Chancellor’s Business: Council meetings 01/2002 to 08/2002
noting that the topics represented a list of issues that would not
routinely come to Council via other routes.
Members suggested the following amendments:
That a preliminary report on the
Marketing Plan & "brand" (scheduled for meeting 8/2002
[9 December]) be provided to Council at meeting 3/2002 (6
May) possibly focussing on "brand positioning".
That a preliminary report on the
Monash Science Technology Research and Innovation Precinct
(STRIP) and Synchrotron be provided. The
Vice-Chancellor suggested that an update on the STRIP
be included in Campus developments topic scheduled
for meeting 3/2002 (6 May). An update on the Synchrotron
could also be provided at meeting 3/2002.
Concluding the discussion, the Chancellor
congratulated the Vice-Chancellor on the interesting breadth of
topics and noted that preliminary reports on the Marketing Plan &
"brand", STRIP and Synchrotron would be included
during discussion of topics scheduled for meeting 3/2002 (6 May).
RESOLUTION CL 1/2002/3
Council noted the schedule of
Vice-Chancellor’s Business: Council meetings 01/2002 to 08/2002
and approved the inclusion of preliminary reports on the, STRIP and
Synchrotron as detailed above.
[Secretarial note: Following the meeting, the
schedule of Vice-Chancellor’s Business: Council meetings 01/2002
to 08/2002 was revised to allow sufficient time for discussion
of the above topics at meeting 3/2002 (6 May). Council members are
invited to note that the topic Fundraising, previously
scheduled for meeting 3/2002, will now be considered at meeting
4/2002 (24 June). A revised schedule is attached. Attachment 2]
4. Sustainability Reporting
In introducing the topic Sustainability
Reporting, the Vice-Chancellor informed Council that a "scoping
study" relating to the application of triple bottom-line reporting
at Monash had been conducted and that an implementation proposal had
been prepared for discussion by Council.
Professor Chris Cocklin, Director, Monash
Environment Institute, took Council through the "scoping study"
noting the following:
that the practice of Sustainability Reporting
(or Triple Bottom-Line Reporting) refers to organisations
reporting on their performance via social, environmental and
economic outcomes;
the objectives of the study included a review
of current practice, consultation with internal stakeholders,
assessment of the availability of appropriate data and
information technology systems and development of a range of
implementation scenarios; and
outcomes from the introduction of
Sustainability Reporting at Monash would include improved
internal and external stakeholder relations, an enhanced
capacity to anticipate and respond to future challenges and
opportunities and advancement of Monash’s position of leadership
in terms of the environmental and sustainability agenda.
Following an outline of the model and process for
implementing Sustainability Reporting, Professor Cocklin informed
Council that the study recommended that Monash implement the
"sufficient" model as detailed on page 11 of the Scoping Study
report. Further, Professor Cocklin noted that the "sufficient" model
would build upon existing information technology processes and
systems, integrate sustainability reporting into the planning
processes of Monash, be introduced via a phased approach that
further refined the Sustainability Reporting framework and would
initially result in draft Sustainability Reports for the Clayton and
Gippsland campuses.
During discussion, members provided a range of
comments including the importance of seeking and incorporating the
views of external stakeholders, the role of Monash in facilitating
and extending the debate on Sustainability Reporting and comment on
the suitability of some indicators.
In response, Council was informed that during
2002 the priorities and views of external stakeholders would be
sought and their views incorporated into the incremental rollout of
the process. Further, Council was advised that the "sufficient
model" was the most appropriate for implementation at this point as
it would enable Monash to bed-down the planned processes and review
the adequacy of the implementation without placing an excessive
burden on current resources.
In concluding discussion, the Chancellor, on
behalf of Council, thanked Professor Cocklin and Ms Jo Strahan
(Monash Sustainability Enterprises) and confirmed that the
implementation plan, as per the "sufficient" model should commence
subject to incorporating and prioritising the requirements of
external stakeholders.
[Secretarial note: a copy of the overheads used
during Professor Cocklin’s presentation are attached for
information. (Attachment 3)]
RESOLUTION CL 1/2002/4
Council received and discussed the scoping study
and approved implementation of the "sufficient" model as detailed in
the document presented.
5. University Self-Review: key themes
The Vice-Chancellor invited Professor Graham Webb
Director, Centre for Higher Education Quality, to introduce the
topic and Mr David Phillips, Special Advisor to the Vice-Chancellor
and President to facilitate discussion.
Professor Webb informed Council that the
Commonwealth Government established the Australian University
Quality Agency (AUQA) in March 2000 to audit teaching, research and
administration in Australian universities on a five-year cycle.
Professor Webb noted that while the establishment of AUQA created a
formal framework for quality audits in the higher education sector,
Monash had, over a long period, recognised that quality was crucial
to its ongoing success.
As part of its commitment to continual
improvement, the Vice-Chancellor’s Group commissioned an
institutional self-review to augment current quality processes and
inform Monash’s preparation of a quality portfolio for any future
AUQA audit.
Following establishment of the review panel
chaired by Professor Stephen Parker, Dean, Faculty of Law, the panel
developed a matrix of review themes, sought input from a wide
cross-section of staff (including use of an on-line survey),
reviewed the output of the interview process and produced the
document University Self-review: Key Emerging Themes
outlining a range of emerging themes.
Mr Phillips invited Council members to comment on
issues and themes as detailed in the document.
During discussion, members provided the following
comments:
the "Monash student experience" varied
depending on campus location and type of course/program -
undergraduate, postgraduate or higher degree by research
program.
Monash needed to further enhance its
strategies to attract the best students, identify the core
experiences that were essential to the Monash student experience
and develop appropriate benchmarks.
A tension exists between the desirability for
uniformity and the benefits derived from offering students a
diverse range of experiences. It was suggested that Monash
identify a core set of experiences that allowed the University
to also capitalise on its internal diversity.
Noting the importance of setting meaningful
benchmarks that facilitated the University’s progress towards
its strategic goals, members noted that implementation of
sustainability reporting could also inform and contribute to the
self-review process.
Noting the dual role of Heads of
Departments/Schools as leaders of the intellectual development
of staff and administrators, Council members supported the need
for on-going support and training in management skills and the
need to improve opportunities for training in aspects of
leadership and overall management skills.
During discussion of time management and
priority setting, it was noted that "priorities" referred not
only to the division of time between research and teaching but
also to the need to balance competing demands at an
institutional level.
During discussion of the strategic and
operational planning cycle and planning horizons, members noted
the need for a flexible and adaptive planning cycle that
facilitated resource planning and permitted both pre-determined
planning horizons and revisions of plans when necessary.
In summarising the discussion, Mr Phillips
thanked Council members for their contribution and noted the
specific issues of the linkages between sustainability reporting and
the ongoing self-review process, the issues raised relating to the
recruitment of students and the "student experience" and the need to
offer incentives that encourage staff to seek further professional
development. Further, while the discussion of five year operational
planning did not generate great enthusiasm, it was noted that
planning horizons needed to facilite appropriate resource planning.
RESOLUTION CL 1/2002/5
Council noted and discussed the key themes
emerging from the University Self-Review.
6. Senior Appointments
6.1 Acceptance of Offers
RESOLUTION CL 1/2002/6
Council noted acceptance of offers of
appointment as detailed in the document presented.
7. Next Meeting
The next meeting of Council is scheduled to be
held at 5.00 pm on Monday, 18 March 2002 at the Berwick
Campus. |