Skip to content | Change text size
 

Academic Promotion Guidelines For Education-Focused Candidates Levels B-E

Monash University recognises that excellence in learning and teaching is vital to its success in transforming the lives of students. Education-focused academics contribute to the achievement of excellence at Monash through scholarship and leadership in educational innovation, research and review at school, faculty, institutional, national and international level, as appropriate to their academic level. They also contribute to the dissemination of good practice across disciplines, professions and the sector.

The academic promotion process enables staff members to progress to the next academic level once they have demonstrated the capacity to perform at that level. The promotion process is available to education-focused academic staff members in order to recognise and reward their escalating contribution in learning, teaching and teaching scholarship.

Education-focused candidates for promotion

An education-focused candidate for promotion is a staff member who is employed by the University as an education-focused academic (either by appointment or via a variation of his or her initial employment contract) and who is eligible for promotion in accordance with the eligibility requirements outlined below.

These guidelines for promotion for education-focused candidates should be read in conjunction with the Staff Development Procedure - Academic Promotion for Candidates Level B and Staff Development Procedure - Academic Promotion for Candidates Levels C-E.

Eligibility requirements

Academics who are appointed to undertake education-focused roles may apply for promotion to Levels B-E.

In order to be eligible for promotion, all promotion candidates must satisfy the relevant promotion committee that he or she has:

  • been a sustained high performer at the present level of appointment, at or above the ‘faculty expectation’ level of academic performance for the candidate’s current level according to the academic performance standards; and
  • the capacity to perform satisfactorily at the level to which promotion is sought, at least at the ‘minimum’ level of academic performance for that level according to the academic performance standards.

As further outlined in the section Building a case for promotion below, education-focused academics are expected to meet all of the University’s academic performance standards, except the quantitative research standards (ie. the faculty or discipline-specific research metrics).

Weightings

By definition, education-focused academics are expected to place a greater focus on teaching and learning and less emphasis on research. Therefore, education-focused candidates for promotion are required to allocate weightings of:

  • a maximum of 85% for education, with a particular emphasis on educational design and delivery and educational leadership;
  • a  minimum of 5% for research; and
  •  a set 10% for service.

As explained further in Building a case for promotion below, education-focused academics are expected to focus their research on pedagogy and teaching and learning scholarship. While a minimum of 5% research weighting is required, it is expected that the amount of research conducted by education-focused academics will escalate as they are promoted through the levels. At Associate Professor and Professor level, for example, education-focused academics are expected to be making a national and/or international contribution to best practice educational learning, scholarship and leadership which would require a greater emphasis on educational research (generally a weighting of 20 to 30%).

Referee Choice

It is recommended that education-focused candidates choose referees who are able to comment on the candidate’s outstanding contribution in learning, teaching and the scholarship of learning and teaching and who will be able to explain the candidate’s impact on the learning and teaching environment.

Application form – maximum word limits

Education-focused candidates should follow the requirements and instructions in the application form however some flexibility is permitted.  All Education-focused candidates may double the existing maximum word requirements as outlined in the education section of the application form (Part 2B).  However education-focused candidates are not expected to meet the maximum word requirements for either of their research and service statements.

Building a case for promotion

In the case of education-focused candidates, significantly greater emphasis should be placed on teaching, and learning and teaching scholarship, with a consequent reduction in expectations for disciplinary research. 

Candidates should demonstrate their commitment to teaching excellence, achievements in teaching documented by awards, peer recognition (eg. sitting on panels assessing teaching quality), excellent student evaluations, the impact of creation of educational materials, curriculum design and pedagogy innovation on student learning outcomes and an institutional, national or international reputation for contributing to pedagogical issues (as appropriate to their academic level). In certain circumstances, candidates may refer to relevant experience in other professional education sectors such as the school education and VET sectors.

Research undertaken by education-focused staff should be pedagogical in nature and focus, even when discipline-related. In some cases, candidates may not have a significant track record of pedagogical research, for example candidates who have recently been converted into an education-focused role.  In such cases, candidates may refer to their disciplinary research. However candidates must clearly demonstrate that their pedagogical research is on an upward trajectory in his or her case for promotion.

Education-focused candidates are not expected to meet the minimum level of the quantitative disciplinary research standards however candidates should refer to relevant qualitative research standards in his or her case for promotion. 

In addition to addressing his or her performance relative to the qualitative research and service performance standards, an education-focused candidate applying for promotion will be expected to provide evidence of her or his achievements as described in the Monash University Qualitative and Quantitative Performance Standards for Education. These standards include measures of both quantitative and qualitative performance at each academic level.  The quantitative education standards are based on the unit evaluations. The qualitative education performance standards are a set of education indicators that are substantially based on the teaching awards criteria.

Addressing the qualitative education performance standards

Candidates should refer to Table 1 (attached) which lists five key themes for candidates to address when commenting on their performance relative to the qualitative education performance standards. Candidates are encouraged to use these five themes as sub-headings in the relevant section of the application form and to address each theme by:

  • referring to the qualitative education performance standards for their academic level; and
  • following the advice outlined in Table 1 for each theme.

Please note that in assessing an application for promotion to levels B and C, significantly less emphasis will be placed on theme 5 than on the other themes listed in Table 1.

Further information

Information on the process for promotion is available from the Academic Promotion website. In addition a series of information sessions on promotion are held in approximately March/April each year.

If you have any particular queries regarding promotion as an education-focused candidate, please contact the Promoting Excellence Team on pe@monash.edu.

Related Procedures and Documents

Table 1 Addressing the qualitative education performance standards

Theme
Key advice for candidates to consider in their case for promotion

Approaches to learning and teaching that influence, motivate and inspire students to learn.

Describe briefly your approach to teaching and give one or two specific examples about what you do as a teacher to inspire, motivate or influence students to learn that will give a reader an insight into your classes/units. You might, for example, inspire students about the importance of the discipline through the use of metaphors; inspire interest in research by drawing from examples of your own research; motivate students through innovative delivery of course materials, for example, problem or case-based learning, or strategies for teaching large classes or diverse students; help them to apply or to see the relevance of theory by relating your industry or service experience; or inspire them by providing opportunities to engage with contexts outside the classroom.  

Development of curricula, resources or services that reflect a command of the field.

Under this sub-heading, outline your contribution to reviewing, writing or redesigning a new unit, program of study, or learning or teaching resources.  Applicants are also welcome to outline their contributions to curriculum reform and consolidation of offerings. The following questions might be considered:

  • What problems or issues was the course design/curriculum designed to address?
  •  Why did you decide to design it a certain way? (tell us about the decisions you took)
  • How did you believe it would engage or benefit the kind of students you have?
  • In what way/s was it innovative?
  • Did it link to Monash programs like the Monash Passport or to the University graduate attributes or enhance employability skills or preparedness for work? How?

Approaches to assessment, feedback and learning support that foster independent learning.

 

The following questions might be considered:

  • •  What kinds of assessment tasks do you set, and why?
  • •  How have you used assessment tasks to provide students with timely and constructive feedback?
  • •  How does the feedback you provide help students to prepare for final assessment tasks?
  • •  If you are teaching in a large or multi-campus unit, how have you worked with other staff to ensure that students are given consistent feedback?
  • •  How are the forms of assessment or feedback designed to assist students to become responsible for and manage their own learning, to identify problems early and seek and gain assistance?

Respect and support for the development students as individuals.

You might provide examples of how you assist students with their orientation into study at Monash University; work with students in ways that are sensitive to their individual needs and perspectives; how you respond to individuals who seek guidance or mentoring; support students in making use of specialist services within the University; how you have assisted students from equity and other demographic subgroups to participate and achieve success in their courses; when you have had an impact on someone’s decision to take an Honours degree or to progress to post-graduate study, to stay enrolled, or to build on a personal interest to carve out a career move; or initiated internationalisation of the curriculum and/or addressed internationalisation as detailed in Monash Directions 2025.

Scholarly activities that have influenced and enhanced learning and teaching.

 

Under this criterion you might discuss:

  • Presentations given to faculty/professional groups/organisations/conferences etc. on an aspect of teaching of your discipline or creation of resources to do this
  • Participation and contribution to faculty/University education committee or working group on learning and teaching
  • Editorship of journals or organiser of conference on teaching of your discipline
  • Teaching and learning internal or external grants or fellowships you have undertaken
  • Leadership of curriculum renewal or educational policy/ies, procedures or adoption of assessment standards in your faculty or program
  • Papers published in journals or books or presentations on your teaching innovations
  • Authorship or contribution to student textbook/s and use of these in your teaching
  • Activities in which you engage in order to continuously improve your teaching, for example attendance at academic development workshops or participation or completion of the GCHE/GCAP.